-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Update brace-expansion to 1.1.12 across all uses #8912
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @joehan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on a widespread dependency update for the brace-expansion
package to mitigate a low-risk vulnerability. The changes span across various modules and test environments, updating both direct and transitive dependencies, and aligning Node.js engine requirements. This also acts as a practical test for an automated dependency update process.
Highlights
- Dependency Update: The
brace-expansion
npm package has been updated to version4.0.1
across numerouspackage.json
andpackage-lock.json
files throughout the repository. This update addresses a low-risk vulnerability present in older versions of the package. - Transitive Dependency Alignment: As part of the
brace-expansion
upgrade, its direct dependencybalanced-match
has also been updated to3.0.1
in manypackage-lock.json
files. Olderconcat-map
dependencies associated withbrace-expansion
have been removed. - Node.js Engine Requirements: The
package-lock.json
files now reflect updated Node.js engine requirements forbrace-expansion
(requiring>= 18
) andbalanced-match
(requiring>= 16
), ensuring compatibility with modern Node.js environments. - Automated Update Process: This pull request serves as a test case for using Gemini to automate dependency updates, demonstrating its capability for managing minor, low-risk vulnerability patches.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the brace-expansion
dependency across the monorepo, likely to address a vulnerability. While the goal is good, the implementation has a few issues. My review highlights a more idiomatic approach using npm overrides
for cleaner dependency management, points out an inconsistency in the target version of brace-expansion
(1.1.12
vs. 4.0.1
), and flags a potentially unintentional Node.js engine version bump in one of the packages.
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ | |||
"archiver": "^7.0.0", | |||
"async-lock": "1.4.1", | |||
"body-parser": "^1.19.0", | |||
"brace-expansion": "^4.0.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding brace-expansion
as a direct dependency in multiple package.json
files is not the ideal way to resolve a vulnerability in a transitive dependency within a monorepo. This approach leads to dependency bloat and can cause version conflicts, as different parts of the project might resolve to different versions of brace-expansion
.
A cleaner solution is to use overrides
in the root package.json
to enforce a single version across all workspaces. For example:
"overrides": {
"brace-expansion": "1.1.12"
}
This would update the vulnerable package to 1.1.12
(which aligns with the PR title and is a safe patch) without adding it as a direct dependency everywhere. This also avoids the major version jump to 4.0.1
, which could introduce breaking changes and contradicts the PR description of a "very minor" update.
Please consider using overrides
and targeting a consistent, safe version.
@@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ | |||
"typescript": "^4.7.4" | |||
}, | |||
"engines": { | |||
"node": ">=18.0.0" | |||
"node": ">=20.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The engines.node
requirement has been bumped from >=18.0.0
to >=20.0.0
. This seems unrelated to the brace-expansion
update, as [email protected]
only requires Node.js >=18
. Was this change intentional? If not, it should probably be reverted to avoid imposing a stricter Node.js version requirement than necessary.
"node": ">=18.0.0"
Description
Testing out using Gemini to update dependencies, starting with a very minor one that has a low risk vulnerability.