Skip to content

Conversation

hufftheweevil
Copy link

On resolving a promise, if there is no success/error, then the pending toast needs to be dismissed. But if there was no pending toast, then toast.dismiss() is being called with undefined, which clears all toast. It should only call toast.dimiss() if id exists for the pending toast.

On resolving a promise, if there is no success/error, then the pending toast needs to be dismissed. But if there was no pending toast, then toast.dismiss() is being called with undefined, which clears all toast. It should only call toast.dimiss() if id exists for the pending toast.
) => {
// Remove the toast if the input has not been provided. This prevents the toast from hanging
// in the pending state if a success/error toast has not been provided.
if (input == null) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of writing double if, you can write in this way with single if -

if (!input && id) {
  toast.dismiss(id);
  return;
}

or

if (input == null && id) {
  toast.dismiss(id);
  return;
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants