Skip to content

Conversation

@cameronhunter
Copy link

Context

Hi, I was using your library and ran into a bug when the Content-Disposition didn't include a filename. The parsed objects also didn't include the name field which was important for my use case.

What's Changed?

  • Migrate to TypeScript
  • Add unit tests
  • Add support for parsing name fields from Content-Disposition
  • Fix bug when filename field was absent in Content-Disposition
  • Fix spelling/grammar mistakes in README.md

* Migrate to TypeScript
* Add unit tests
* Add support for parsing `name` fields from Content-Disposition
* Fix bug when `filename` field was absent in Content-Disposition
* Fix spelling/grammar mistakes in README.md
@cameronhunter
Copy link
Author

👋🏻 @christiansalazar – I'm happy to continue to use my fork of the package, but I'm wondering if there's any interest in merging this?

@christiansalazar
Copy link
Contributor

christiansalazar commented Mar 23, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants