Add fbthrift to OSS-Fuzz#15278
Open
digiscrypt wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
|
digiscrypt is integrating a new project: |
Author
|
@vitaliset can you look into this |
DavidKorczynski
requested changes
Apr 24, 2026
Collaborator
DavidKorczynski
left a comment
DavidKorczynski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you a maintainer of the project? If not, are maintainer emails in the project.yaml and can you have maintainers confirm here that they would like to integrate into OSS-Fuzz and are happy with the up.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds OSS-Fuzz integration for fbthrift.
The setup builds a minimal fuzz target focused on protocol deserialization (Binary and Compact protocols). The build stays lightweight and avoids pulling in the full dependency graph.
The fuzzer has been tested locally with helper.py using both address and undefined sanitizers.
Upstream PR: facebook/fbthrift#695