Add geojson support to map widget - #185
Open
rambip wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for boisterous-sunburst-a5c941 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
berhalak
self-requested a review
January 12, 2026 12:57
Author
|
@berhalak any progress on the subject ? |
Contributor
|
Hi @rambip, Sorry for the delay. Will review this week. |
berhalak
removed their request for review
April 23, 2026 11:53
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds experimental geojson support for the map widget.
This fixes #158
The current design choice is the following:
I tried to keep the original behaviour when possible, and adapt it to geojson:
Something I would like to add is a way to specify colors, because it can be very useful for polygons and lines. But it may be outside the scope of this PR.
Note: the formatting is pretty odd at some locations, it would be nice to format the code consistently. I use the typescript formatter with default settings.