Skip to content

OIDC diagrams #2657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

OIDC diagrams #2657

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ZachGoldberg
Copy link
Contributor

@ZachGoldberg ZachGoldberg commented Jul 11, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new section explaining the fundamentals of OIDC for both public and private CI/CD platforms.
    • Included sequence diagrams to illustrate authentication flows to AWS using OIDC.
    • Clarified differences in setup and validation for public versus private CI/CD environments.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 11, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 11, 2025 6:01pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 11, 2025

Walkthrough

A new documentation section was added to explain the fundamentals of OIDC authentication for both public and private CI/CD platforms. This includes conceptual explanations and two sequence diagrams illustrating the authentication flows to AWS, without altering any code or exported entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/concepts/cloud-auth.md Added a new section detailing OIDC authentication flows for public and private CI/CD platforms, with two sequence diagrams.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant CI/CD Platform (Public)
    participant AWS
    participant SCM Host

    CI/CD Platform (Public)->>SCM Host: Generate key pair, sign JWT
    CI/CD Platform (Public)->>AWS: Send JWT
    AWS->>SCM Host: Fetch public key
    AWS->>AWS: Validate JWT signature & content
    AWS-->>CI/CD Platform (Public): Return temporary AWS credentials
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant CI/CD Platform (Private)
    participant S3 Bucket
    participant AWS

    CI/CD Platform (Private)->>S3 Bucket: Publish public key
    CI/CD Platform (Private)->>AWS: Update IdP provider URL & issuer
    CI/CD Platform (Private)->>AWS: Generate & sign JWT with updated issuer
    AWS->>S3 Bucket: Fetch public key
    AWS->>AWS: Validate JWT signature & content
    AWS-->>CI/CD Platform (Private): Return temporary AWS credentials
Loading

Poem

OIDC flows, both public and shy,
Now mapped in diagrams, easy on the eye.
From SCM hosts or S3's embrace,
Credentials granted in a seamless race.
With docs expanded, understanding grows—
Secure pipelines, where knowledge flows!
🚀🔐


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fb273c and 3767b09.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/concepts/cloud-auth.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/concepts/cloud-auth.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Pull Request has non-contributor approval
  • GitHub Check: validate_build
  • GitHub Check: Validate generated content

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/concepts/cloud-auth.md (4)

75-80: Rephrase the introductory sentence for precision and tone

The phrase “like some self-hosted GitLab Ultimate, GitHub Enterprise etc. instances” is a bit vague and slightly informal. Consider tightening it up and explicitly naming the products rather than using “etc.” to keep the docs crisp.

-The below diagrams illustrate how CI/CD Platforms use OIDC to authenticate to cloud accounts (AWS in these examples).  There is a difference in how this is done for publicly available CI/CD platforms (like GitHub.com and GitLab Cloud) and non-publicly available CI/CD platforms (like some self-hosted GitLab Ultimate, GitHub Enterprise etc. instances).
+The diagrams below illustrate how CI/CD platforms use OIDC to authenticate to cloud accounts (AWS in these examples). The process differs between publicly available platforms (e.g., GitHub.com, GitLab.com) and private, self-hosted platforms (e.g., GitLab Ultimate Self-Managed, GitHub Enterprise Server).

90-94: Replace raw HTML <br> with Mermaid-friendly line breaks

Mermaid sequence-diagram text nodes don’t reliably render raw HTML tags. Use the Mermaid‐supported line-break sequence (\\) instead to avoid rendering issues.

-  AWSIdP->>SCMPublicRoute: Fetch public key via HTTPS <br>(which validates that the SCM is who it says it is)
+  AWSIdP->>SCMPublicRoute: Fetch public key via HTTPS \\n(which validates that the SCM is who it says it is)

104-109: Inconsistent participant label capitalisation

AwsIdP (lower-case “s”) breaks the naming convention you set earlier (AWSIdP). Align the casing to avoid confusion.

-  participant AWSIdP as AWS IdP & STS
+  participant AWSIdP as AWS IdP & STS

(Note: also update the later arrow definitions that use AwsIdP.)


112-116: Clarify who updates the AWS IdP settings

Line 113 implies that the SCM itself updates the provider URL in AWS, which is done by an administrator, not the CI/CD platform. A quick wording tweak removes that potential confusion.

-  SCM->>AwsIdP: Update provider URL in AWS IdP to S3 bucket public URL
-  SCM->>SCM: Update issuer to hostname of S3 bucket public URL
+  Admin->>AWSIdP: Configure provider URL in AWS IdP to point to the S3-hosted JWKS
+  Admin->>SCM: Set issuer to the S3 bucket’s hostname

(Adjust participant names in the diagram header accordingly if you adopt this change.)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3522b31 and 1fb273c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/concepts/cloud-auth.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Validate generated content
  • GitHub Check: validate_build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant