Skip to content

code-generators now marked to 3.8 spec #8134

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2022
Merged

code-generators now marked to 3.8 spec #8134

merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2022

Conversation

gbaz
Copy link
Collaborator

@gbaz gbaz commented May 10, 2022

followup from #7688

fgaz
fgaz approved these changes May 10, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@fgaz fgaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Mikolaj
Mikolaj approved these changes May 10, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Mikolaj Mikolaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gbaz gbaz added the squash+merge me Tell Mergify Bot to squash-merge label May 10, 2022
@Mikolaj Mikolaj mentioned this pull request May 10, 2022
Merged
3 tasks
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2558927 into master May 10, 2022
@andreasabel andreasabel added the re: code-generators Concerning the `code-generators` field/functionality for `testsuite`s label Jun 13, 2022
@andreasabel andreasabel mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2022
Merged
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Mikolaj Mikolaj Mikolaj approved these changes

@fgaz fgaz fgaz approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
attention: needs-review re: code-generators Concerning the `code-generators` field/functionality for `testsuite`s squash+merge me Tell Mergify Bot to squash-merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@gbaz @Mikolaj @fgaz @andreasabel