Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix a typo in chapter ends and coends #332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/content/3.10/ends-and-coends.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

\lettrine[lhang=0.17]{T}{here are many intuitions} that we may attach to morphisms in a category,
but we can all agree that if there is a morphism from the object
$a$ to the object $b$ than the two objects are in some way
$a$ to the object $b$ then the two objects are in some way
``related.'' A morphism is, in a sense, the proof of this relation. This
is clearly visible in any poset category, where a morphism \emph{is} a
relation. In general, there may be many ``proofs'' of the same relation
Expand Down
Loading