Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 15, 2020. It is now read-only.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion holochain.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ \subsubsection{Gossip \& World Model}
\item Define subsets of $G_\text{with}(m)$ according to a correlation with what it means to have low vs. high confidence value $c$:
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Pull}: consisting of nodes about which a low confidence means a need for more frequent gossip to raise a node's confidence. Such nodes would include those for which, with respect to the given node, hold its published entries, hold entries it is also responsible for holding, are close the then node (i.e. in its lowest k-bucket), and which it relies on for routing (i.e. a subset of each k-bucket)
\item \textbf{Push}: consisting of nodes about which a high confidence implies a need for more frequent gossip to spread the information about that node. Such nodes would include ones for which a given node has high confidence is a bad actor, i.e. it has directly experienced bad acting, or has recevied bad actor gossipe from nodes that it has high confidence in being able to make that bad actor evaluation.
\item \textbf{Push}: consisting of nodes about which a high confidence implies a need for more frequent gossip to spread the information about that node. Such nodes would include ones for which a given node has high confidence is a bad actor, i.e. it has directly experienced bad acting, or has received bad actor gossip from nodes that it has high confidence in being able to make that bad actor evaluation.
\end{enumerate}
\item \todo{TODO: describe a gossip trigger function based on the pull vs. pull distinction that demostrates when gossip happens}
\end{enumerate}
Expand Down