Skip to content

feat(releases-widget): added auto icon search when editing a repository #3087

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Aandree5
Copy link
Contributor


Homarr

Thank you for your contribution. Please ensure that your pull request meets the following pull request:

  • Builds without warnings or errors (pnpm build, autofix with pnpm format:fix)
  • Pull request targets dev branch
  • Commits follow the conventional commits guideline
  • No shorthand variable names are used (eg. x, y, i or any abbrevation)

This will enable the url icon to auto populate from the formatted identifier name. Following the same structure as the App widget, hopefully keeping the experience consistent across the board.

  • The user can still choose to not have an icon if they remove the icon url, the auto search will then be off until the next name/idenifier change.

I tried taking advantage of the findBestIconMatch in icon-matcher.ts but for that I had to add the export to the form-collection index file, let me know if this was the correct approach.

depends #3086

@Aandree5 Aandree5 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 11, 2025 22:57
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented May 11, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 93b122c..641a759. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants