-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
fix the crash in Wan-AI/Wan2.2-TI2V-5B-Diffusers if CP is enabled #12562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sywangyi
wants to merge
1
commit into
huggingface:main
Choose a base branch
from
sywangyi:wan2.2_5B_CP_FIX
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+19
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you elaborate why this is needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
when cp is enabled, seq_len is split, timestep_shape is [batch_size, seq_len, 6, inner_dim], so should be split in dim_1 as well since hidden state is split in seq_len dim as well. or else shape miss match will occur
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you think we can just change _cp_plan? https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/src/diffusers/models/transformers/transformer_wan.py#L546
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you mean split timestep in forward? adding
"": {
"timestep": ContextParallelInput(split_dim=1, split_output=False)
}, to _cp_plan will make 5B work, but 14B fail since 5B timestep dims is 2. 14 timestep dims is 1.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, this is an interesting situation. To tackle these, I think we might have to revisit the
ContextParallelInputandContextParallelOutputdefinitions a bit more.If we had a way to tell the partitioner that the input might have "dynamic" dimensions depending on the model configs (like in this case), and what it should do if that's the case, it might be more flexible as a solution.
@DN6 curious to know what you think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes a lot of things easier, for sure!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
expand_timesteps is not passed in WanTransformer3DModel init, so, no way to judge if timestep.dim is 2 or 1 currently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can add a config if we want to
i want to hear @DN6 's thoughts on this first though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's also very in line with
transformersdoes it btw.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yiyixuxu @DN6 we allow passing
parallel_configthroughfrom_pretrained(), too. Wonder, if it could make sense to allow users to pass a custom_cp_planthrough it.