[bump minor] 2d mean continuum

[iprafols]

This PR implements a new framework to compute the delta field. This is encapsulated in a new ExpectedFlux module and should not affect the current standard runs

Wanted features that are still missing and will be added in future PRs

• Full tests on the new framework
• Automatic detection of z edges

[iprafols]

something weird is going on with the pylint checks

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR implements a new framework for computing delta fields through an ExpectedFlux module, specifically adding 2D mean continuum functionality that can compute the mean continuum as a function of both wavelength and redshift.

• Adds new MeanContinuumInterpExpectedFlux class with support for both 1D and 2D interpolation
• Modifies the continuum computation utilities to handle 2D interpolators
• Updates configuration to accommodate new framework parameters

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 11 comments.

File	Description
pylintrc	Extends line length limit and adds matrix variable names to accepted variables
py/picca/delta_extraction/expected_fluxes/utils.py	Updates continuum computation to support 2D interpolators and improves error handling
py/picca/delta_extraction/expected_fluxes/mean_continuum_interp_expected_flux.py	Implements new framework with 2D mean continuum computation capabilities
.github/workflows/pylint.yml	Pins pylint version for consistent CI behavior

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[corentinravoux]

Hi @iprafols thanks for the PR, did you include the changes done by Julien ?

[corentinravoux]

Did you find the issue with pylint ?

[iprafols]

Not yet, I can't seem to even reproduce the issue locally

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[iprafols]

@corentinravoux can we merge this now?

[corentinravoux]

Hi @iprafols sorry I was not very available this week.
Since the code added is modular and not impacting the main analysis, and you resolved all copilot raised issues, I am in favor of merging !

[corentinravoux]

Those changes are fixes inside the main analysis ?

[iprafols]

The same code is used in the main analysis, yes. 1. There are three sets of changes:

1. the one in lines 60-66 (new code) is a basic if to manage the new type for the mean_cont and does not have an impact on the main analyisis
2. the one in lines 94-109 gets rid of a nasty "errors not positive defined" warning we kept having in iminuit. They don't seem to change the main analysis though
3. the one in lines 119-120 is an extra test that the continuum is fine, and it might impact a few forests. Now intead of having them full of NaNs, they are simply ignored.

[iprafols]

In any case, none of the changes seem to impact the main analysis

[corentinravoux]

I just added two small questions but I am in favor for merging

[corentinravoux]

Thanks for the changes, I agree that we can merge !