-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
87 add blurring tutorial #94
Conversation
Deploying with
|
Latest commit: |
4818f87
|
Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
Preview URL: | https://fba3d7c8.image-js-docs.pages.dev |
Branch Preview URL: | https://87-add-blurring-tutorial.image-js-docs.pages.dev |
This is not an explanation of why mean blur is potentially inferior to other types of blur. It's just an explanation about how the algorithm works. I suppose gaussian blur has nicer mathematical properties, but I would not really be able to expand much on that. Either drop this or try to do some research to have a valid explanation of why gaussian blur is a better choice in some circumstances. |
In what circumstances? |
There is an unfinished phrase |
Some parts look good, and I like the gif on convolution |
The sentence is not very clear to me (at least there systax errors). Also the point you do about performance difference between box blur and gaussian at the beginning of the article does not seem obvious to me. You are saying that calculating the kernel values makes it slower, but that has to be done only once so I don't think that affects performance. |
No description provided.