Added VHDL support #128
Open
Added VHDL support #128
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When boilerstrapping this framework to my other modular monotonic frameworks and deploying my application in one-per-byte containers I just had too much overhead to deal with. Hotdoq-cli just couldn't keep up with HTML9's responsiveness, and I had way to much data asyncs.
That's why we here are now doing our web applications in VHDL. It makes working with states much easier. Deployment now happens on our FPGA boards, together with in-house developed ethernet controllers. The days of cloud computing and virtualizing are officially over, hardware deployment is the way to go.