[FEATURE] Unique field ids #665
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
einpraegsam
force-pushed
the
develop
branch
4 times, most recently
from
a31ca4e to
43b5957
Compare
|
Thanks for your contribution. This definitly makes sense. :-) I will have a look at it in the next couple of weeks (depending on my time though.) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on issue #181 the partials were modified, so that the id also includes the uid of the content element.
id="powermail_field_{field.marker}_{ttContentUid}"It's possible to use multiple powermail forms with the same field names on the same page now.