Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create provisional and compat features around the vect type #328

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mandolaerik
Copy link
Contributor

@mandolaerik mandolaerik commented Oct 21, 2024

  • Include docs for compat and provisionals in 1.2 refman too
  • Allow provisional declarations in DML 1.2
  • Repair pickling of provisionals
  • Create provisional and compat features around the vect type
  • Dogfood the c_vect provisional

@mandolaerik mandolaerik changed the title Dogfood the c_vect provisional Create provisional and compat features around the vect type Oct 21, 2024
@mandolaerik mandolaerik force-pushed the pr/dogfood-the-c_vect-provisional branch from 6e31f31 to 1d81bd5 Compare October 21, 2024 12:02
@syssimics
Copy link
Contributor

Verification #14005157: ❌ fail

@mandolaerik mandolaerik force-pushed the pr/dogfood-the-c_vect-provisional branch from 1d81bd5 to b2a4cfd Compare October 22, 2024 10:57
@syssimics
Copy link
Contributor

Verification #14009292: ❌ fail

@mandolaerik mandolaerik force-pushed the pr/dogfood-the-c_vect-provisional branch from b2a4cfd to c587b73 Compare October 22, 2024 12:37
@syssimics
Copy link
Contributor

Verification #14009657: ❌ fail

The duplicated headers are unfortunate, and is there because one
of them mentions "1.4" specifically. It's not a problem if we let
the 1.2 versions rot.
On popular demand. Also, rename ECVECT -> EOLDVECT
and c_vect_without_provisional -> experimental_vect
@mandolaerik mandolaerik force-pushed the pr/dogfood-the-c_vect-provisional branch from c587b73 to 015229f Compare October 22, 2024 15:45
@syssimics
Copy link
Contributor

Verification #14010442: ❌ fail

@syssimics
Copy link
Contributor

Verification #14010884: ✅ pass

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants