Skip to content

clean skip list in skip_list_common.py #1825

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

PenghuiCheng
Copy link
Contributor

clean skip list in skip_list_common.py, removed passed cases.

@PenghuiCheng PenghuiCheng requested review from Copilot and daisyden July 9, 2025 07:21
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the skip list in skip_list_common.py by removing tests that now pass and clearing out obsolete entries.

  • Removed numerous outdated skip entries for tests that are passing
  • Replaced long tuples of skip names with None for files no longer needing skips
  • Pruned excess comments related to removed entries
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

test/xpu/skip_list_common.py:4

  • There's a typo in the comment: 'claimn' should be 'claim' or better yet rephrased as 'doesn't support FP8 yet'.
        # XPU implementation doesn't claimn FP8 now

test/xpu/skip_list_common.py:7

  • [nitpick] This comment appears outdated now that entries have been removed. Consider deleting it or clarifying what should still be removed.
        # To be removed from this file.

Copy link
Contributor

@daisyden daisyden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@chuanqi129
Copy link
Contributor

@mengfei25 please check the UT test check failure, whether there are some new failures or skipped some still failed cases by this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants