Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: update instead of insert on client edit #199

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 13, 2025
Merged

fix: update instead of insert on client edit #199

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 13, 2025

Conversation

thelissimus-work
Copy link
Contributor

@thelissimus-work thelissimus-work commented Mar 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Closes: #196

@cypress Cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Mar 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Default Project    Run #176

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #176  •  git commit cae74f37f7: Merge pull request #199 from iota-uz/sdk-196
Project Default Project
Branch Review main
Run status status check passed Passed #176
Run duration 00m 22s
Commit git commit cae74f37f7: Merge pull request #199 from iota-uz/sdk-196
Committer Diyor Khaydarov
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 3
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

diyor28
diyor28 previously requested changes Mar 12, 2025
View reviewed changes
@diyor28 diyor28 merged commit cae74f3 into staging Mar 13, 2025
2 checks passed
@diyor28 diyor28 deleted the sdk-196 branch March 13, 2025 10:14
@jcbbb jcbbb mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@diyor28 diyor28 diyor28 left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@thelissimus-work @diyor28