Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove duplicate formulation of admissible header item entries #143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

pdobacz
Copy link
Member

@pdobacz pdobacz commented Jul 4, 2024

This is a follow up of #141 There were other entries off in this table. I also think we should not duplicate the ranges in the bullet points above, so I removed these and had the reader refer to the table.

WDYT?

@pdobacz pdobacz self-assigned this Jul 4, 2024
@pdobacz pdobacz requested a review from chfast July 4, 2024 14:55
Copy link
Member

@chfast chfast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this is good. However, maybe we should use decimal values in the table? I think 1024 is better than 0x0400.

@gumb0
Copy link
Contributor

gumb0 commented Jul 9, 2024

Yes, this is good. However, maybe we should use decimal values in the table? I think 1024 is better than 0x0400.

I like it in hex, because you can clearly see that the value fits into two bytes.

@pdobacz
Copy link
Member Author

pdobacz commented Jul 22, 2024

OK, then I'll merge here and open a mirror PR in the EIP

@pdobacz pdobacz merged commit 7d6ff25 into main Jul 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@pdobacz pdobacz deleted the fix-format-table branch July 22, 2024 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants