Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.0] Add an e2e test for Ambient config in IstioCNI #617

Conversation

istio-testing
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an automated cherry-pick of #591

This PR implements an e2e test-case for the recent fix
istio-ecosystem#563

Related to: istio-ecosystem#500
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Gaddam <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.27%. Comparing base (4d8972d) to head (bdc6e5a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on release-1.0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-1.0     #617       +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage        47.19%   74.27%   +27.08%     
================================================
  Files               40       40               
  Lines             2511     2511               
================================================
+ Hits              1185     1865      +680     
+ Misses            1266      557      -709     
- Partials            60       89       +29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@istio-testing istio-testing merged commit 7dc3e32 into istio-ecosystem:release-1.0 Feb 6, 2025
18 checks passed
openshift-service-mesh-bot pushed a commit to openshift-service-mesh-bot/sail-operator that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
* upstream/release-1.0:
  Updates to dual-stack section (istio-ecosystem#622)
  Add an e2e test for Ambient config in IstioCNI (istio-ecosystem#617)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants