Skip to content

Integrate Claude AI #36

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 8, 2025
Merged

Integrate Claude AI #36

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

dev-opsss
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

This PR integrates Claude AI capabilities into our application, providing users with an additional AI model option alongside existing ones. Claude AI is known for its strong reasoning capabilities and context handling.

Changes

  • Added Claude AI client implementation
  • Updated the AI provider interface to support Claude
  • Added configuration options for Claude API
  • Implemented message formatting specific to Claude's requirements
  • Added unit tests for Claude integration

Implementation Details

The implementation follows our existing pattern for AI providers, with Claude-specific adaptations for message formatting and API communication.

Key Files Changed

  • Added new Claude client implementation
  • Updated provider factory to include Claude
  • Modified configuration to support Claude API keys and endpoints
  • Updated UI to show Claude as an available model option

Testing

  • Unit tests verify Claude client correctly formats messages
  • Integration tests confirm successful API communication
  • Manual testing performed with various prompt types

Configuration

Users will need to provide a Claude API key in their configuration to use this feature.

Copy link
Collaborator

@bhaumikmaan bhaumikmaan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requesting changes. I'm sure the UI and SDK integration is tested
@Ornithopter-pilot need your review as well, mostly with how we set defaults and the if-else nesting we have in places.
Thanks for the contribution. Let me know if you need help with anything

@dev-opsss dev-opsss requested a review from bhaumikmaan April 8, 2025 16:11
Copy link
Collaborator

@bhaumikmaan bhaumikmaan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some remaining unresolved. The one's you fixed look good.

For the one's unresolved and resolved but not fixed, let me know if you want me to hop in and make the changes

@bhaumikmaan
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry if you feel I'm a bit buggy but the changes will help this be a one time thing. Again let me know if you feel you are done contributing so I can jump in and complete the rest
Thanks for your contribution

@bhaumikmaan bhaumikmaan added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 8, 2025
@dev-opsss
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Please check now, i have pushed the changes. and resolved all which is needed.

@dev-opsss dev-opsss requested a review from bhaumikmaan April 8, 2025 16:27
Copy link
Collaborator

@bhaumikmaan bhaumikmaan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Thanks for your continuous efforts

@bhaumikmaan
Copy link
Collaborator

Added reviewers to wrap this PR

Copy link
Collaborator

@us1415 us1415 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@bhaumikmaan bhaumikmaan merged commit 0ada479 into j4wg:main Apr 8, 2025
@bhaumikmaan
Copy link
Collaborator

Merged
Thanks @dev-opsss
Really looking forward to your contributions moving forward

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants