Conversation
|
Hello, me again! Took a browse: I am also encountering negative atom densities, which I want to purge. Demo: Side-bar: I might attack CRAM sub-steps next to further improve oscillations etc. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR attempts to accelerate depletion runs by:
Because this is a less elegant (in terms of code writing) approach, a new file is created instead of overwritting the existing
openmc_activator.pyOn my MacBook Pro, it took me 127 mintues wall clock time using the previous method, and now it takes ~7 mintues. YMMV, do let me know.
The input/output call is the same, so to test this, just change the first cell in the
compare.ipynbnotebook:to: