Initial commit of anagram checker for Python assignment 1#1
Open
Initial commit of anagram checker for Python assignment 1#1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TITLE: UofT-DSI | Python - Assignment 1
What changes are you trying to make? (e.g. Adding or removing code, refactoring existing code, adding reports)
I have added Python to the anagram checker to compare two words to see if they are anagrams
What did you learn from the changes you have made?
The main lesson was applications of data types like sets. Also, was reminded about the importance of how indented things are as that caused a couple of problems when I was not careful enough.
Was there another approach you were thinking about making? If so, what approach(es) were you thinking of?
I was also considering putting the two input words into a tuple so I didn't need to repeat the loop to convert each word into a set of letters. Given we only had two words, I felt that using one loop per word was simpler and more readable, but I'm actually not sure if this was the right decision?
Were there any challenges? If so, what issue(s) did you face? How did you overcome it?
My biggest challenge was modifying/transforming values and getting the expected outputs. When testing, I eventually just added a few print steps in key places so I could see the output at a certain point and debug from there vs guessing.
How were these changes tested?
I used the provided test words to ensure I saw the expected output for each.
Checklist