Adding "some" higher-order functions for collections #21
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kakkoyun
changed the title
Update package.json and readme
Add higher order functions.
gasp
pushed a commit
to gasp/json-logic-js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2020
Feat/upgraded outdated deps
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
map,filter,some,everyoperation support for collections.I don't know if you prefer approach that you introduced in #15 but to achieve deferred execution,
=>operator introduced, so function can be embedded directly in specs.I tried to respect conventions of code, using ESLint, pardon me any inconvenient changes.
It would be great if you suggest any refinements or improvements.
I can implement same functionality for Ruby, add documentation if needed. I wrote small number of tests, I can improve them also.