Skip to content

Conversation

@edmundnoble
Copy link
Contributor

@edmundnoble edmundnoble commented Sep 15, 2025

This should also ensure that we don't do any duplicate reads during the check. Needs a test.

@edmundnoble edmundnoble marked this pull request as draft September 15, 2025 19:40
Change-Id: Id0000000c60d845aa153e43572634523b216e77a
Change-Id: Id00000006fd84f56c27dcd113bb387c19f70ff18
| InsertErrorTimedOut
| InsertErrorPactParseError Text
| InsertErrorWrongChain Text Text
| InsertErrorDefPactComplete Text
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason against using DefPactId and render the error later?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tend to agree that I prefer richer types in error data types, with a render function. But, this is only a weak concern from me.

@chessai
Copy link
Contributor

chessai commented Oct 10, 2025

I recommend adding a test once the SPV endpoints are working on pp/evm.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants