Skip to content

Conversation

MSattrtand
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolves partially #324

@blcham
Copy link
Contributor

blcham commented Oct 17, 2025

@MSattrtand please rebase (not urgent)

@MSattrtand MSattrtand force-pushed the refactor-s-pipes-core branch 2 times, most recently from 423895e to e25a4ac Compare October 17, 2025 12:09

@Parameter(iri = SML.replace)
private boolean isReplace = false;
private final boolean isReplace = false;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this does not make sense to make final because it is parameter of module

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reverted see my last commits and resolve after you read this.

private static String getValuesClauseValues(ResultSet resultSet, int rowsCount) {

StringBuffer valuesBuffer = new StringBuffer();
StringBuilder valuesBuffer = new StringBuilder();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the reason for this?

"\n\t - exception [3]: \"\n{}\n\""
, query, bindings, getStackTrace(ex));
log.error("""
Failed execution of query [1] for binding [2], due to exception [3]. \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Failed execution of query [1] for binding [2], due to exception [3]. \
Failed execution of query [1] for binding [2], due to exception [3].

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why you need this ... also check for other "" as well

@blcham blcham force-pushed the refactor-s-pipes-core branch from a7c85bc to 9ad2b05 Compare October 19, 2025 20:27
@blcham blcham self-requested a review October 19, 2025 20:53
public class SPINEnhancedNodeFactory extends Implementation {
private final Node type;
private Constructor enhNodeConstructor;
private Constructor<?> enhNodeConstructor;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You removed the warning but did not really solve the issue that the warning was indicating .. see my last commits


}

@Disabled
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please go over all your changes within this PR and put back all @disabled tests ... I would like to address this outside of this issue ... in most cases i will want to implement those tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants