fix: nft precision tx list

[samufacanha2]

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• Bug Fixes
  • Fixed asset precision lookup in transactions to correctly parse asset identifiers using the base segment, improving accuracy for complex asset references.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0c364cd0-78ad-4bfc-9440-5235680a42fc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf05ad2 and f25df49.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/pages/transactions/index.tsx

Disabled knowledge base sources:

• Jira integration is disabled

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

---

Walkthrough

A single function modification in the transaction pages component adjusts how asset precision is looked up by using the asset ID prefix before a forward slash instead of the full identifier string.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Asset Precision Lookup src/pages/transactions/index.tsx	Modified getTransactionPrecision function to extract and use the asset ID prefix (segment before '/') as the key for looking up asset precision values, rather than the complete asset ID string.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A dash becomes a guide so true,
The slash reveals what we pursue,
Asset precision, neat and trim,
Before the stroke, the lookup wins! ✨

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
• 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/nft-precision-tx-list

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 0.46%. Comparing base (bf05ad2) to head (f25df49).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/pages/transactions/index.tsx	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #602      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage     0.46%   0.46%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          530     530              
  Lines        20951   20952       +1     
  Branches      4982    5286     +304     
==========================================
  Hits            97      97              
+ Misses       20854   20043     -811     
- Partials         0     812     +812     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.