Skip to content

Conversation

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma mboersma commented Dec 2, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR bumps the version of CAAPH used in tests to v0.5.2.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A, but see #5892 for prior art.

Special notes for your reviewer:

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests
  • cherry-pick candidate

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Dec 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from Jont828 December 2, 2025 17:11
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 2, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 44.59%. Comparing base (856e605) to head (b226b4c).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5989      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   44.59%   44.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         279      279              
  Lines       25166    25166              
==========================================
- Hits        11224    11222       -2     
- Misses      13129    13131       +2     
  Partials      813      813              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh nojnhuh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: b6a622de86b3803484166672fd76dfd1250fad8c

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nojnhuh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 4, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 4, 2025

@mboersma: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade b226b4c link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e b226b4c link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade b226b4c link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint b226b4c link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor Author

mboersma commented Dec 8, 2025

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from nojnhuh December 8, 2025 20:42
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants