Replace context.Background() with t.Context()

[bochengchu]

What type of PR is this?
/kind other

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests

Release note:

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

@bochengchu: The label(s) kind/other cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?
/kind other

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests

Release note:

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @bochengchu!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @bochengchu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-gcp ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	14aa859
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-gcp/deploys/68c460eef744aa000768f332
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1514--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-gcp.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[justinsb]

Thanks for jumping on this @bochengchu

/ok-to-test

/approve
/lgtm

/hold for @cpanato - are we OK to bump go versions? This PR came out the discussion here #1507 (comment)

[bochengchu]

/retest-required

[k8s-ci-robot]

@bochengchu: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest-required

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[damdo]

There are other places where we need to bump go.

I suggest we keep this PR just for bumping t.Context()(we can park it for a little), and have a separate PR like usual where we do the Go v1.24/CAPI v1.11/K8s 1.34 bumps all together (e.g. for the previous bumps we did that in #1459), I suggest we do that in @justinsb's #1509 to keep everything initially confined there.

[damdo]

I think we can rebase this now and get to merge it @bochengchu @justinsb

[damdo]

/ok-to-test

[damdo]

/lgtm

[cpanato]

cool

thanks!

/unhold

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bochengchu, cpanato, justinsb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [cpanato,justinsb]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment