Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enforce provisioning requests processing even if all pods are new #7688

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

macsko
Copy link
Member

@macsko macsko commented Jan 10, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Successful processing of ProvisioningRequests can happen when len(readyNodes) >= a.MaxNodesTotal. Moreover, ProvisioningRequests' pods may have been incorrectly filtered by allPodsAreNew (those pods exists virtually and shouldn't be taken into consideration). This PR adds a new processor: ScaleUpEnforcer, which, depending on unschedulablePods, decides whether the scaleUp action should be forced, bypassing two mentioned checks.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

ProvisioningRequests can now be processed without delay if they have just been created.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jan 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: macsko
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign x13n for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from x13n January 10, 2025 11:53
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 10, 2025
@macsko
Copy link
Member Author

macsko commented Jan 10, 2025

/cc @aleksandra-malinowska @gabesaba

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 10, 2025
@macsko macsko force-pushed the enforce_provisioning_request_processing_even_if_all_pods_are_young branch 2 times, most recently from dd6ffe4 to b9f4196 Compare January 10, 2025 12:31
@macsko macsko force-pushed the enforce_provisioning_request_processing_even_if_all_pods_are_young branch from b9f4196 to d7c325a Compare January 10, 2025 13:09
Copy link
Contributor

@gabesaba gabesaba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/cluster-autoscaler cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants