Skip to content

kunalsuri/ai-fication-kit

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

49 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ai-fication-kit — legacy → AI-native, with a human in the loop



DOI

Node 18+ Python 3.8+ Apache 2.0 License Status: experimental

Claude Code GitHub Copilot Google Antigravity Works with

CI

A Simple & Elegant Way to Make any Codebase / Repo AI-native while keeping it Trustworthy.

Giving AI Tools / Coding Agents Context & Creating a Knowledge layer to optimize Token utilization.


A Toolkit to Give AI Coding Agents a Trusted Map of Any Existing/Legacy Repo

  • Drafted by AI Agents, verified by Humans, and kept mechanically honest.

  • One command scaffolds it, and depending on the complexity of the codebase, it can be made trustworthy in 30 minutes to a few hours.

  • Two outcomes from one workflow: it makes your codebase AI-native, and it produces AI-Powered Repo Intelligence — a human-approved knowledge-base (ai/) that lets a new teammate onboard instantly.



📑 Table of Contents



🔑 The Three Pillars

Transforming a legacy repository into a trusted AI-native environment rests on three mechanisms:

  • 🏗️ Agent Scaffolding: Stamps agent instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md), slash commands (/cold-start, /add-feature), subagent personas (repo-explorer, feature-builder), and reusable skills into .claude/ — plus native GitHub Copilot equivalents in .github/ and Google Antigravity equivalents in .agents/.
  • 🧠 Repository Context: Generates a structured ai/ folder — a centralized, human-readable map of conventions, architecture, modules, and features that agents query instead of crawling raw source.
  • 🤝 Human-in-the-Loop Trust: Every agent-drafted claim starts as [inferred] and is promoted to [verified] only by a human. Deterministic verify and drift checks fail CI when the docs no longer match the file tree — a ready-made GitHub Actions workflow (ai-check.yml) ships with the kit — so the maps cannot silently fall out of sync.


Tip

Brand new here? Follow the one linear path in docs/GETTING-STARTED.md (zero → trusted map in five steps), and keep the Glossary open for any unfamiliar term ([inferred], Stability, slash command, …). New to AI coding agents specifically? Jump to the 2-minute primer first. The full manual — tutorials, audit guide, CLI reference, methodology — lives in the docs/ hub.



⚡ Quick Start

Get up and running in under five minutes.

Prerequisites: Node.js ≥ 18 or Python ≥ 3.8 — pick whichever you prefer. Both installers are feature-identical and zero-dependency (stdlib only, no packages to install).


🔄 How It Works [Overview]


Flowchart showing the ai-fication-kit workflow: maturity check, orient scan, install scaffolding, cold-start inference, human audit, verify checks, and add-feature development


1️⃣ Run the Scaffolder [Shazam == Orient + Install]


Tip

The name shazam is inspired by the magic word: the idea is to transform a repository into an AI-native repository with a single command. Under the hood, shazam runs check-repo-maturityorient → starts the intake wizard → stamps the intelligence layer → prints clear next steps.


Select one of the options (A or B) below depending on your stack and preferences:

Option A: Direct via npx (No Clone Required, JS/TS Developers)

Run the installer directly using npx against the GitHub repository:

# 1 · Preview the installation (writes nothing, dry-run)
npx github:kunalsuri/ai-fication-kit shazam /path/to/your/repo --dry-run

# 2 · Run the live installation
npx github:kunalsuri/ai-fication-kit shazam /path/to/your/repo

Option B: Local Clone (Node.js or Python Developers)

Clone the repository and run the scripts locally (pure Node.js or Python stdlib):

# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/kunalsuri/ai-fication-kit.git
cd ai-fication-kit

# Run with Node.js
node install.mjs shazam /path/to/your/repo

# OR run with Python (pure stdlib, no external dependencies)
python install.py shazam /path/to/your/repo

Two more deterministic commands worth knowing (no LLM, seconds to run — see docs/CLI-REFERENCE.md for every command, flag, and exit code):

# Deeper analysis: dependency graph, code metrics, structural health scores
#   → ai/repo-indepth.json   (or pass --analysis-level indepth to shazam)
node install.mjs indepth /path/to/your/repo

# Changed your mind? Removes exactly what the installer wrote
#   (reads ai/install-manifest.json; timestamped backups are preserved)
node install.mjs uninstall /path/to/your/repo

2️⃣ Initialize Agent Loop / Mapping [Claude Code-specific Command]

Open your target repository in Claude Code (or your agent of choice) and run:

/cold-start

This command could take 5 minutes or more depending on the size of the repository as the agent scans the codebase and drafts the initial map.


3️⃣ Conduct Your Human Audit

Open ai/guide/MODULE_MAP.md to review the generated draft:

  1. Define each module's Stability (frozen / stable / ours / ?).
  2. Mark verified entries as [verified].
  3. Keep the docs mechanically honest — at any time, cross-check every file-path claim in the maps against the real tree (deterministic, no LLM):
# Every file-path claim in the knowledge docs must exist on disk
node install.mjs verify /path/to/your/repo --strict

# The reverse check: code the map no longer covers (--git also flags
# [verified] rows whose underlying code has changed since the audit)
node install.mjs drift /path/to/your/repo --git

The stamped GitHub Actions workflow (.github/workflows/ai-check.yml) runs both checks on every push and pull request, so the map cannot silently rot.


Tip

The audit is the step that makes everything else trustworthy. See docs/AUDIT-GUIDE.md for a step-by-step walkthrough, and docs/FAQ.md for answers to common questions.


📦 What You Get: The "AI-Native Repo Intelligence"

This kit scaffolds a minimal, highly structured knowledge directory inside your target repository. Once /cold-start has populated it and a human has verified it, this ai/ directory is your AI-Powered Repo Intelligence — the knowledge-base that both agents and new teammates read to get up to speed:


your-repo/
├── CLAUDE.md                   # auto-loaded by Claude Code (thin; points everywhere else)
├── AGENTS.md                   # same rules for Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Windsurf
├── CLAUDE_bkp_*.md             # (Process 2 only) timestamped backup of prior config
├── AGENTS_bkp_*.md             # (Process 2 only) timestamped backup of prior config
├── ai/
│   ├── INDEX.md                # role → path manifest (prompts reference roles, not paths)
│   ├── repo-profile.json       # machine-readable facts from orient (deterministic)
│   ├── repo-indepth.json       # (optional) indepth: dependency graph, metrics, health scores
│   ├── install-manifest.json   # what the installer wrote + content hashes (clean uninstall, safe re-runs)
│   ├── guide/                  # navigation, loaded every session
│   │   ├── MODULE_MAP.md       # directory → responsibility → Stability  ← START HERE
│   │   ├── PROJECT_OVERVIEW.md · ARCHITECTURE.md · FEATURE_MAP.md · CONVENTIONS.md
│   ├── analysis/               # generated artifacts, loaded on demand
│   │   ├── FEATURE_CATALOG.md  # feature → files index (+ _BACKEND/_FRONTEND splits)
│   │   ├── diagrams/           # Mermaid; regenerate, don't hand-maintain
│   │   ├── audit-reports/      # verification, drift, & maturity reports
│   │   └── problems/           # dated analyses of specific issues
│   └── lab/                    # development intelligence: specs/, decisions/ (ADRs),
│                                 evaluations/, experiments/
├── .claude/                    # Claude Code: commands (/cold-start, /add-feature, …),
│                                 subagents (repo-explorer, feature-builder, test-runner),
│                                 and the add-feature skill
├── .github/                    # GitHub Copilot: copilot-instructions.md, prompts/*.prompt.md
│                                 (same commands), chatmodes/*.chatmode.md (same subagents)
└── .agents/                    # Google Antigravity: workflows/*.md (same commands),
                                  skills/add-feature/ (shared Agent Skills format)

Directory Structure Highlights

  • Root Guides (CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md): Thin root files that point the agent to the ai/ folder.
  • Knowledge Guide (ai/guide/): Core maps (MODULE_MAP.md is your starting point!), conventions, and architectural overviews loaded by the agent every session — and, once verified, the first thing a new team member reads to onboard.
  • Analysis Outputs (ai/analysis/): Deep analytical results generated by the agent (e.g. diagrams, feature catalogs, and problems logs).
  • Lab Space (ai/lab/): A dedicated area for specifications (RFCs), architecture decision records (ADRs), and evaluations.
  • Agent Operations (.claude/, .github/, .agents/): Reusable workflow commands, helper subagents (repo-explorer, feature-builder, test-runner), and custom agent skills — stamped natively for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity in one install.

The Eight Workflow Commands

Every command ships in three native formats — Claude Code slash command (.claude/commands/), Copilot prompt (.github/prompts/), and Antigravity workflow (.agents/workflows/):

Command What it does
/cold-start Bootstrap the ai/guide/ maps and diagrams; drafts everything as [inferred] for a human to audit.
/add-feature Safeguarded implementation: spec first, locate via the maps, surgical diffs, tests before done, knowledge updated after.
/check-drift Run the verify + drift checks and report missing documentation or stale references.
/create-feature-catalog Deep-mine the source to discover implemented features; writes ai/analysis/FEATURE_CATALOG.md.
/review-agent-config Read-only diagnostic of CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md for completeness, consistency, and stale artifacts.
/post-cold-start-verification Audit every ai/ file for gaps, stale placeholders, and inconsistencies after cold-start.
/verify-ai-readiness Holistic assessment of the knowledge layer on a 5-level maturity scale; flags agent-blocking gaps.
/perform-feature-add-simulation Dry-run the add-feature workflow for a proposed feature — friction report and readiness score, no code written.

Detailed Overview of the Methodology

Process Flow Diagram

The diagram below shows both installation paths from initial scan through to safeguarded development:

flowchart TD
    %% ─── Entry ───
    Repo[("Your Repository")] --> Maturity["0. check-repo-maturity<br/>(11 deterministic checks)"]
    Maturity --> Orient["1. orient<br/>(detect stack)"]
    Orient --> Profile[["ai/repo-profile.json"]]
    Profile --> Decision{"Process 1 or 2?"}

    %% ─── Process 1: Legacy ───
    Decision -- "Process 1 (Legacy)<br/>→ No prior config" --> Install1["2. install<br/>(stamp templates)"]
    Install1 --> Scaffolded1[["CLAUDE.md + AGENTS.md<br/>+ ai/ knowledge layer"]]

    subgraph P1["Process 1 — Legacy Repo (from scratch)"]
        Install1
        Scaffolded1
    end

    %% ─── Process 2: Modern ───
    Decision -- "Process 2 (Modern)<br/>→ User-authored config" --> Backup["2a. Backup existing files<br/>CLAUDE_bkp_YYYYMMDD_HHmmss.md"]
    Backup --> Install2["2b. install<br/>(overwrite after backup)"]
    Install2 --> Scaffolded2[["CLAUDE.md + AGENTS.md<br/>+ ai/ + timestamped backups"]]

    subgraph P2["Process 2 — Modern Repo (backup + upgrade)"]
        Backup
        Install2
        Scaffolded2
    end

    %% ─── Shared: Cold-Start ───
    Scaffolded1 --> ColdStart
    Scaffolded2 --> ColdStart

    subgraph AgentLoop["Agent Loop (Inferred)"]
        ColdStart["3. /cold-start<br/>(agent infers maps)"]
        Step05{"Process 2?<br/>Backup files exist?"}
        ColdStart --> Step05
        Step05 -- "Yes" --> Extract["Step 0.5: Extract knowledge<br/>from *_bkp_*.md backups"]
        Extract --> InferredMap
        Step05 -- "No" --> InferredMap[["MODULE_MAP.md<br/>[inferred]"]]
    end

    %% ─── Shared: Human Gate ───
    subgraph HumanGate["Human Gate (Trust Verification)"]
        InferredMap --> Audit["4. Human Audit<br/>(set Stability, flip tags)"]
        Audit --> VerifiedMap[["MODULE_MAP.md<br/>[verified]"]]
    end

    %% ─── Shared: Dev Loop ───
    subgraph DevLoop["Development (Safeguarded)"]
        VerifiedMap --> Verify["5. verify + drift<br/>(mechanical checks)"]
        Verify --> AddFeature["6. /add-feature<br/>(safe implementation)"]
    end

    %% ─── Styling ───
    class Repo repo;
    class Maturity,Decision gate;
    class Orient,Install1,Backup,Install2 setup;
    class Profile,Scaffolded1,Scaffolded2,InferredMap,VerifiedMap files;
    class ColdStart,Step05,Extract,Verify,AddFeature agent;
    class Audit human;

    classDef repo fill:#2d3748,stroke:#1a202c,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef gate fill:#d69e2e,stroke:#975a16,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef setup fill:#2b6cb0,stroke:#1a365d,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef files fill:#553c9a,stroke:#322659,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef agent fill:#2f855a,stroke:#1c4530,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef human fill:#c53030,stroke:#742a2a,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;

    style P1 fill:none,stroke:#2b6cb0,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5;
    style P2 fill:none,stroke:#d69e2e,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5;
    style AgentLoop fill:none,stroke:#2f855a,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5;
    style HumanGate fill:none,stroke:#c53030,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5;
    style DevLoop fill:none,stroke:#00a3c4,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5;

Loading

Click to Expand: Process Flow Explained

Process 1 — Legacy Repo (No Existing AI Config)

This is the original flow. The kit creates everything from scratch:

  1. check-repo-maturity → detects no user-authored CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.mdProcess 1
  2. orient → reads marker files, writes ai/repo-profile.json with maturity.process: 1
  3. install → stamps all templates (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, ai/ tree)
  4. /cold-start → agent drafts ai/guide/ docs from the code, all tagged [inferred]

Process 2 — Modern Repo (Existing AI Config)

For repos that already have a hand-written CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md:

  1. check-repo-maturity → detects user-authored files (no <!-- Installed by ai-fication-kit footer) → Process 2
  2. Backup → copies CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE_bkp_20260617_221847.md (timestamped, never conflicts)
  3. orient → reads marker files, writes ai/repo-profile.json with maturity.process: 2
  4. install → overwrites the backed-up files with kit templates, stamps ai/ tree
  5. /cold-start Step 0.5 → reads *_bkp_*.md files, extracts knowledge (conventions, architecture, gotchas, module descriptions) → merges into ai/guide/ docs tagged [inferred — from prior config]
  6. /cold-start continues normally → drafts remaining docs from code

[!IMPORTANT] Nothing is lost. Backup files are preserved through uninstall. The prior config becomes seed knowledge for the new ai/ layer — the best of both worlds.

The 7-Step Workflow

Step Owner Description
0️⃣ check-repo-maturity Script (Seconds) Read-only diagnostic. 11 deterministic checks (version control, build system, tests, CI/CD, docs, locks, code structure, license, AI config). Scores 0–100, determines Process 1 or 2. No LLM, no writes.
1️⃣ orient Script (Seconds) Deterministic observation. Reads marker files (package.json, pom.xml, pyproject.toml, *.csproj/*.sln, CMakeLists.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, etc.) and writes ai/repo-profile.json (languages, build/test commands, fork status, maturity data). No LLM. Nothing executed.
2️⃣ install Script (Seconds) Scaffolding. Process 2: backs up existing files first. Then stamps templates into your repository. Records every written file in an install manifest so uninstall can perform a clean removal.
3️⃣ /cold-start Agent (~5 Mins) Model inference. Process 2: Step 0.5 extracts knowledge from *_bkp_*.md backups first. Then drafts MODULE_MAP.md, diagrams, and candidate features. Every claim is tagged [inferred].
4️⃣ Your Audit You (~30 Mins) The trust verification. Review the map, set module stability (frozen / stable / ours / ?), and flip confirmed rows to [verified].
5️⃣ Verify (Recommended) Script + Agent Stability checks. verify (script, no LLM) mechanically cross-checks every file-path claim in the docs against the real tree → VERIFICATION_MANIFEST.json + report. Then /post-cold-start-verification (semantic gap report), /verify-ai-readiness (maturity rating), or /perform-feature-add-simulation (simulated friction check).
6️⃣ /add-feature Agent Safeguarded development. The agent builds specs, navigates using the maps, runs tests, and updates the knowledge layer without touching frozen code.

🌉 The Bridge to AI-Native Onboarding

Diagram showing a bridge connecting legacy codebase complexity on the left to AI-native developer workflow on the right, with the ai/ knowledge layer as the bridge span


Tip

For engineers onboarding onto a complex codebase, the learning curve is historically steep. AI coding agents can accelerate this transition, but they get lost without a reliable map. This kit acts as a bridge: combining a minimal knowledge store (the ai/ folder) with automated tooling to help developers and AI agents collaborate safely. It is designed to help engineers adapt and become AI-native very fast.


Running this kit delivers two outcomes at once:

1. It makes your codebase AI-native. Agents stop guessing. They read a compact, provenance-tracked map instead of re-crawling the tree every session, so they edit the right module and respect what's off-limits.

2. It produces AI-Powered Repo Intelligence. When you run /cold-start, the agent gathers everything it can learn about the repository — module responsibilities, architecture, feature touch-points, conventions, diagrams — and writes it into the ai/ folder. A human then approves it (the [inferred][verified] flip). At that point ai/ is no longer scaffolding: it is a verified knowledge-base, a single trustworthy source of truth about the repo that both humans and agents can rely on.

🚀 Instant onboarding for new team members

Once the knowledge-base is verified, the payoff isn't limited to AI agents — it's for people too.

Historically, a new engineer joining a complex or legacy codebase spends days (sometimes weeks) reverse-engineering it: which module does what, what's safe to touch, where a feature actually lives, why a decision was made. That tribal knowledge usually lives in a few people's heads.

With a verified ai/ knowledge-base in place, a new teammate can onboard almost instantly:

  • They read ai/guide/MODULE_MAP.md to see, at a glance, every module, its responsibility, and whether it's frozen / stable / ours.
  • They follow PROJECT_OVERVIEW.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and FEATURE_MAP.md for the why and the where.
  • They (or their AI agent) can ask questions against the knowledge-base and trust the answers, because a human signed off on every [verified] claim.

The same human-verified map that keeps AI agents honest becomes the fastest onboarding doc your team has ever had — and because the verify step keeps it mechanically honest, it stays accurate as the code evolves.


🛡️ The Problem & The Solution

Side-by-side comparison: left panel shows a chaotic legacy repo with scattered files and no context, right panel shows the same repo with structured ai/ knowledge maps providing clear navigation

🛑 The Problem: The Agent Context Tax

AI coding agents (such as Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot) are highly capable, but they are context-blind on large or legacy repositories.

  • Token Burn: They re-read the directory tree every session.
  • Guesswork: They guess which files are safe to modify, burning through your context windows.
  • Dangerous Hallucinations: An agent-hallucinated map is worse than no map: the agent will confidently edit the wrong module.

✅ The Solution: A Provenance-Tracked Map

The answer isn't to rewrite your code. It's to give the agent a provenance-tracked map where every claim must be validated by you:

  • [inferred] ➔ Scaffolds and maps drafted by the AI agent or installer.
  • [verified] ➔ Human-checked and confirmed repository facts.
  • 🚫 Strict Security: AI agents are forbidden from marking their own drafts as [verified]. The flip is your signature.

🤖 New to AI Coding Agents? Start Here

Illustrated glossary of AI coding concepts: agent, context window, slash commands, provenance tags, and subagents, each with a short definition and icon

If slash commands and "context windows" are new to you, here is a quick terminology orientation:

🤖 AI Coding Agent An autonomous assistant (like Claude Code, Cursor, or Copilot) that goes beyond simple autocomplete. It can read files, execute terminal commands, and perform edits across your codebase.

💻 Claude Code Anthropic's command-line coding agent. In the Claude Code interface, commands are prefixed with a slash (like /cold-start or /add-feature).

🧠 Context Window & Tokens The active working memory of an AI agent. Because large codebases easily overwhelm this memory, this kit builds a compact ai/ directory map so the agent reads key maps instead of crawling the entire project.

🏷️ Provenance Tagging The trust boundaries of the repository:

  • [inferred]: Scaffolding and drafts generated automatically by the AI agent.
  • [verified]: Human-checked, finalized files. AI agents are structurally restricted from modifying verified code.

👥 Subagents Helper assistant processes (repo-explorer, feature-builder, test-runner) spawned by the main agent to perform specific, isolated tasks.

Using GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, Cursor, or Codex instead of Claude Code?

The knowledge layer is tool-agnostic — every agent reads the same AGENTS.md rules and ai/ maps — and the workflow automation is now native in more tools than Claude Code:

  • GitHub Copilot — one install stamps .github/copilot-instructions.md, native prompt files for every workflow command (/cold-start, /add-feature, …), and chat modes mirroring the repo-explorer / feature-builder / test-runner subagents.
  • Google Antigravity — the same commands as native workflows in .agents/workflows/, plus the add-feature skill in the shared Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format.
  • Cursor, Codex, Windsurf — read AGENTS.md natively; drive the workflow by hand, e.g. paste the contents of .claude/commands/cold-start.md as a prompt to run the cold-start pass.

See docs/MULTI-TOOL-SETUP.md for the full per-tool guide.


For More Details on Toolkit & Security

⚖️ Click to Expand: How This Toolkit Differs

While other tools scaffold files or evaluate repositories, this kit focuses on trust through provenance, with the human as the authority:

Design Pillar How We Implement It
Deterministic Scan vs. Model Inference A strict separation between deterministic environment checks (orient) and model generation (/cold-start).
Provenance Tracking The strict [inferred][verified] progression ensures you always know what has been human-checked.
Fork-Aware Stability Classified stability markers (frozen / stable / ours / ?) prevent the agent from touching upstream or legacy modules.
Active Verification The verify command deterministically cross-checks every file-path claim in the knowledge docs against the source tree (manifest + report, no LLM); agent workflows then cover the semantic checks a script cannot judge.
Drift Detection The drift command catches the reverse problem as code evolves — directories the map no longer covers, entries that have vanished, and (with --git) [verified] rows whose code changed — so the map ages with the repo instead of silently rotting.
Dual-Mode Installation Automatic detection of legacy vs. modern repos. Process 2 preserves prior knowledge through timestamped backups and feeds it into /cold-start as seed intelligence — no user work is lost.
Incremental Re-Runs (child-lock) Re-running install/shazam is safe by construction: a hash-verified three-way compare brings in new kit assets, refreshes untouched kit files, and keeps anything you edited. Files carrying a human [verified] tag are never overwritten — even with --force.

The full trust model and workflow rationale, in depth: docs/METHODOLOGY.md.


🔒 Click to Expand: Security & Trust Guarantees

We designed the installer to be lightweight and safe:

  • 🪶 Zero Dependencies – Node stdlib / Python stdlib only. No external npm packages.
  • 🔒 No Network or Execution – It only copies and stamps text files. No remote API calls or arbitrary code runs.
  • 🛡️ Safe Scoping – It only writes files inside your target directory.
  • 🔍 Dry-Run Support – Run with --dry-run to see exactly what files will be created before writing anything.
  • 🧹 Clean Removal – The installer writes ai/install-manifest.json. The uninstall command reads it to remove exactly what was written, leaving no trace.
  • 🔁 Safe Re-Runs & Upgrades – The manifest records a SHA-256 hash for every stamped file. Re-running the installer keeps your edits, and a file carrying a human [verified] tag is never overwritten — even with --force. The only way through that child-lock is the explicit --force-verified flag, which quotes exactly what would be lost and requires typed consent (backups are still taken).

For more details, read both installers or refer to SECURITY.md.


🤝 Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines. Issues, example repos, and template improvements are the most helpful contributions right now. The project is pre-v1.0 and maintained by a single author — feedback from running the kit on real legacy repositories is especially valuable.


📖 Citation

If you use this kit in academic or research work, please cite it:

@software{suri2026aificationkit,
  author    = {Suri, Kunal},
  title     = {ai-fication-kit: a methodology for making legacy codebases AI-native and trustworthy through scaffolded, human-verified context},
  year      = {2026},
  url       = {https://github.com/kunalsuri/ai-fication-kit},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.20860637},
  version   = {0.1.0},
  license   = {Apache-2.0}
}

See CITATION.cff for the machine-readable format.


📄 License

This project is licensed under the Apache License 2.0.


🙏 Acknowledgments

Ongoing R&D work at CEA LIST, France.

Author: Kunal Suri (@kunalsuri)

About

AI-Fication Kit: A Simple & Elegant Way for Making any Legacy Codebase AI-native through Scaffolded, Human-verified Context.

Topics

Resources

License

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors