Fix use of rust cache on CI

[DiegoCivi]

Fix rust cache on CI

Description

The rust-cache we are using on the CI was generating error because we were setting it up before doing the checkout. This generates the error since the cache tries to use the Cargo.toml to generate the cache key and is not able to find it.

Also, the job run-cairo-release for the cairo_programs/stwo_exclusive_programs was not being executed because of a misuse of the cache. These were removed from the CI job since they are already runned in the tests (here and here).

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.402 s ±  0.064 s    [User: 23.547 s, System: 0.852 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.357 s … 24.447 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.338 s ±  0.031 s    [User: 23.479 s, System: 0.855 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.316 s … 24.360 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.157 s ±  0.005 s    [User: 23.513 s, System: 0.856 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.153 s … 13.161 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.185 s ±  0.031 s    [User: 23.572 s, System: 0.820 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.164 s … 13.207 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.878 s ±  0.269 s    [User: 35.793 s, System: 1.093 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.688 s … 10.068 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.234 s ±  0.127 s    [User: 35.381 s, System: 1.032 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.144 s … 10.323 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.04 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.783 s ±  0.250 s    [User: 36.157 s, System: 1.051 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.607 s …  9.960 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.685 s ±  0.225 s    [User: 35.919 s, System: 1.030 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.526 s …  9.843 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.914 s ±  0.279 s    [User: 36.339 s, System: 1.081 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.717 s … 10.111 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.783 s ±  0.084 s    [User: 36.213 s, System: 1.051 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.724 s …  9.843 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.700 s ±  0.127 s    [User: 36.484 s, System: 1.141 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.610 s …  9.790 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.052 s ±  0.019 s    [User: 36.157 s, System: 1.171 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.038 s … 10.065 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.04 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.064 ± 0.024	2.042	2.107	1.00 ± 0.02
head big_factorial	2.062 ± 0.032	2.033	2.122	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	1.980 ± 0.007	1.969	1.996	1.00
head big_fibonacci	1.987 ± 0.018	1.969	2.028	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.039 ± 0.025	7.000	7.073	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.171 ± 0.435	6.984	8.402	1.02 ± 0.06

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.128 ± 0.011	2.109	2.149	1.01 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.112 ± 0.017	2.085	2.141	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.387 ± 0.011	1.377	1.417	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.407 ± 0.011	1.398	1.435	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.170 ± 0.004	1.164	1.175	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.186 ± 0.022	1.169	1.230	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.136 ± 0.029	7.084	7.176	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.140 ± 0.030	7.106	7.193	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.214 ± 0.041	7.153	7.294	1.01 ± 0.01
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.176 ± 0.042	7.124	7.257	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.076 ± 0.021	2.066	2.136	1.00
head linear_search	2.083 ± 0.010	2.063	2.096	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.470 ± 0.007	1.460	1.482	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.474 ± 0.021	1.457	1.531	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.408 ± 0.005	1.402	1.415	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.418 ± 0.017	1.404	1.464	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.186 ± 0.009	1.177	1.208	1.00 ± 0.01
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.186 ± 0.009	1.175	1.199	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.497 ± 0.007	1.484	1.508	1.00 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.496 ± 0.009	1.486	1.509	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	518.9 ± 1.7	517.3	523.1	1.00
head pedersen	519.7 ± 2.5	517.3	525.9	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	595.2 ± 3.7	591.2	601.5	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	599.0 ± 8.1	592.4	618.9	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.761 ± 0.011	1.746	1.777	1.01 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.750 ± 0.006	1.744	1.763	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	617.3 ± 1.3	615.2	619.5	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	617.7 ± 1.7	615.2	621.8	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.004 ± 0.013	3.986	4.023	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.030 ± 0.023	4.000	4.072	1.01 ± 0.01

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (bf8967a) to head (4a38d8b).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2169   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.67%   96.67%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines       43944    43944           
=======================================
  Hits        42483    42483           
  Misses       1461     1461           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JulianGCalderon]

LGTM!