Unify deps makefile target

[DiegoCivi]

Unify deps makefile target

Description

Tested this on mac and linux by doing make deps and then make tests. It worked on both.

Closes #2097

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.757 s ±  0.000 s    [User: 23.883 s, System: 0.871 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.757 s … 24.757 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.737 s ±  0.001 s    [User: 23.854 s, System: 0.880 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.736 s … 24.738 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.477 s ±  0.010 s    [User: 23.988 s, System: 0.902 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.469 s … 13.484 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.484 s ±  0.007 s    [User: 24.020 s, System: 0.908 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.480 s … 13.489 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.239 s ±  0.083 s    [User: 36.223 s, System: 1.082 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.181 s … 10.298 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.132 s ±  0.041 s    [User: 36.825 s, System: 1.063 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.103 s … 10.161 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.089 s ±  0.110 s    [User: 36.801 s, System: 1.079 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.011 s … 10.167 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.216 s ±  0.051 s    [User: 36.737 s, System: 1.087 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.180 s … 10.252 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.159 s ±  0.042 s    [User: 37.094 s, System: 1.089 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.129 s … 10.188 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.997 s ±  0.058 s    [User: 37.180 s, System: 1.135 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.956 s … 10.038 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.02 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.089 s ±  0.015 s    [User: 37.153 s, System: 1.182 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.078 s … 10.099 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.018 s ±  0.071 s    [User: 37.414 s, System: 1.191 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.968 s … 10.068 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.108 ± 0.025	2.072	2.153	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	2.100 ± 0.012	2.080	2.118	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.028 ± 0.014	2.010	2.050	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.024 ± 0.020	2.002	2.067	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.293 ± 0.072	7.150	7.419	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.326 ± 0.091	7.136	7.434	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.188 ± 0.031	2.145	2.237	1.01 ± 0.02
head compare_arrays_200000	2.167 ± 0.028	2.125	2.208	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.419 ± 0.011	1.406	1.447	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.431 ± 0.013	1.407	1.449	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.206 ± 0.013	1.188	1.223	1.00 ± 0.01
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.203 ± 0.007	1.191	1.211	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.387 ± 0.136	7.213	7.709	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.391 ± 0.101	7.185	7.547	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.470 ± 0.195	7.272	7.974	1.00
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.491 ± 0.186	7.285	7.869	1.00 ± 0.04

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.165 ± 0.022	2.135	2.212	1.01 ± 0.02
head linear_search	2.153 ± 0.031	2.104	2.219	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.502 ± 0.024	1.469	1.562	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.508 ± 0.023	1.485	1.560	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.454 ± 0.009	1.438	1.469	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.455 ± 0.018	1.433	1.481	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.215 ± 0.024	1.183	1.273	1.00 ± 0.02
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.209 ± 0.017	1.183	1.230	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.538 ± 0.013	1.526	1.567	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.543 ± 0.018	1.524	1.576	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	529.4 ± 5.7	520.9	538.9	1.00
head pedersen	533.2 ± 3.9	527.3	541.9	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	618.5 ± 5.4	606.7	626.0	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	619.6 ± 8.6	610.0	634.0	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.773 ± 0.012	1.750	1.792	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.792 ± 0.009	1.776	1.806	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	649.2 ± 7.1	641.6	666.2	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	663.3 ± 17.4	646.0	689.1	1.02 ± 0.03

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.176 ± 0.078	4.094	4.351	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.189 ± 0.068	4.115	4.302	1.00 ± 0.02

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.68%. Comparing base (958ae7e) to head (9318b7a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2211   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.68%   96.68%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines       44027    44027           
=======================================
  Hits        42566    42566           
  Misses       1461     1461           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JulianGCalderon]

LGTM!