-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Escape PostgreSQL options #3800
Open
V02460
wants to merge
3
commits into
launchbadge:main
Choose a base branch
from
V02460:postgresql-escape-options
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+20
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This bothers me for a few reasons:
options_str
character-by-characterThe latter two both serve to create unnecessary allocation pressure. While this isn't a super hot routine, a lot of little allocations tend to increase heap fragmentation, which is compounded by the number of options being passed to a connection, the lengths of the values, and the number of connections that are opened over the lifetime of the application.
With just an extra ten lines of code, it's possible to avoid the intermediate allocation and write the whole string at once if there are no characters to escape: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=0b0bb2909484f9578c2e4c02ed1f41b5
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You would use it like this:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the quick and thorough feedback! I like your suggestion and tried to apply it – but:
The key and value parameters of the
options
function are of theDisplay
trait. To avoid heap allocations your solution would have to be adopted tostruct PgEscapeOption<T: Display>(T);
. I don’t think that is possible.One can sidestep the problem by changing the parameters of the
options
function to take a string instead, so their backing buffer can be accessed. However, that would slightly restrict the user in what they can pass in.I don’t think that does any harm on its own. I agree with the other points.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I realized that only late last night. It is possible, you just need to drop down a layer: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=a8a59849ca9c7d1f3a76d4bfe1ab05f8
Not quite as elegant but still avoids the intermediate allocations.
No, it's just a little weird.