Skip to content

Conversation

@charlielito
Copy link
Contributor

User-Facing Changes
Add rosboard connection support

Description
We added a new type of connection that uses rosboard protocol to send live data way more lightweight than rosbridge or foxgloves' weksocket connector. For more details see our discourse post: https://discourse.ros.org/t/introducing-foxglove-integration-with-rosboard-for-real-time-visualizations/38376

It would be nice if the now open-source version of foxglove supported this so anyone could it as well. The only problem is that we had to modify rosboard in our fork for this integration and currently it supports only ROS2. What are your thoughts?

Checklist

  • The web version was tested and it is running ok
  • The desktop version was tested and it is running ok
  • This change is covered by unit tests
  • Files constants.ts, types.ts and *.style.ts have been checked and relevant code snippets have been relocated

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been marked as stale because there has been no activity in the past 3 months. Please add a comment to keep it open.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 28, 2025
@charlielito
Copy link
Contributor Author

Waiting for feedback from any contributor...

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Apr 29, 2025
@ctw-joao-luis
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @charlielito! First of all sorry for the delay answering to this PR! I'd like to know if is it's possible to make your fork up to date with Lichtblick so the pipelines are updated and able to run here.

Cheers,
Joao

@charlielito
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @charlielito! First of all sorry for the delay answering to this PR! I'd like to know if is it's possible to make your fork up to date with Lichtblick so the pipelines are updated and able to run here.

Cheers, Joao

just updated the branch with the latest stuff

@ctw-joao-luis
Copy link
Contributor

just updated the branch with the latest stuff

Hey! Thanks for doing that! So im going to review the PR, but in the meanwhile could you fix the lint errors and other stuff that's making the pipelines fail? Adding some unit tests would be important too

@carolinabamorim
Copy link
Contributor

@charlielito gentle reminder

@gabriela-almeida-ctw gabriela-almeida-ctw changed the base branch from main to develop August 8, 2025 14:52
@gabriela-almeida-ctw gabriela-almeida-ctw changed the base branch from develop to main August 8, 2025 16:28
@gabriela-almeida-ctw gabriela-almeida-ctw changed the base branch from main to develop August 29, 2025 10:30
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been marked as stale because there has been no activity in the past 3 months. Please add a comment to keep it open.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 28, 2025
@charlielito
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll take a look

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Dec 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants