Skip to content

LSPS5 follow up: Move TimeProvider to utils::time module for better organization #3962

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

martinsaposnic
Copy link
Contributor

@martinsaposnic martinsaposnic commented Jul 25, 2025

This is a follow up for the LSPS5 merged PR. Comment by @tnull #3662 (comment)

Might be worth moving this to some crate::utils::time or similar path, if we'll end up keeping it at all. (in a follow-up)

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jul 25, 2025

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@martinsaposnic martinsaposnic mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2025
14 tasks
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.92%. Comparing base (ff279d6) to head (81313cd).
⚠️ Report is 33 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #3962    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   88.91%   88.92%            
========================================
  Files         173      174     +1     
  Lines      123393   123794   +401     
  Branches   123393   123794   +401     
========================================
+ Hits       109717   110083   +366     
- Misses      11216    11252    +36     
+ Partials     2460     2459     -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzing 22.21% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
tests 88.75% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@martinsaposnic martinsaposnic force-pushed the move-time-provider-to-utils branch from 735dc48 to 81313cd Compare July 25, 2025 17:30
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt requested review from TheBlueMatt and removed request for valentinewallace July 26, 2025 18:51
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit d56f71f into lightningdevkit:main Jul 26, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@tnull tnull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

post-merge ACK

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants