You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To make it easier to test against own gateway running on a different port, or dofferent public ones, we could check if IPFS_GATEWAY is present in ENV, and if so, use its value as whitespace-separated list of gateways to use instead of the hardcoded one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, it is based on loose convention from ipfs/kubo#8847 and curl/curl#8805,
where we went with IPFS_GATEWAY as most of the time a user will set this to their preferred (local/LAN) gateway, so when set, plural option will rarely be used.
Not set in stone, but would keep it the same, hoping to standardize this at some point (in ipfs/specs#280 or separate IPIP).
Current list of trustless gateways is hardcoded in
ipfs-chromium/library/src/ipfs_client/gateways.cc
Lines 68 to 89 in 0e8d229
To make it easier to test against own gateway running on a different port, or dofferent public ones, we could check if
IPFS_GATEWAY
is present in ENV, and if so, use its value as whitespace-separated list of gateways to use instead of the hardcoded one.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: