-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[libc++] Fix no-op shrink_to_fit for vector<bool> #120495
Open
winner245
wants to merge
1
commit into
llvm:main
Choose a base branch
from
winner245:vector_bool_shrink_to_fit
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+43
−8
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The part of the test suite located under
libcxx/test/std
is intended to be portable and usable by other implementations (like MSVC STL or libstdc++). As such, we don't use things specific to libc++ likeC::__storage_type
. Or if we absolutely must, we either:libcxx/test/libcxx
, which contains tests that are not entirely portable, or#if defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)
, orLIBCPP_ASSERT
fromtest_macros.h
.Which of those three we do depends on the amount of libc++ specific test code we're trying to add, maintenance burden, etc.
In this case, the very best would be to figure out the number of bits per word via some public-facing API if that's doable, but I'm not certain it is. Otherwise, I would probably go for
#if defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)
around those two tests.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your insightful feedback. The three options you mentioned have provided me with some new and valuable information that I wasn't previously aware of.
Among the options, I believe using
#if defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)
around the two tests that useC::__storage_type
would be the most appropriate for my purpose. This is because libc++ and libstdc++ have different word sizes (libc++ usesAlloc::size_type
, which is typically 64 bits, while libstdc++ usesunsigned long
). Moreover, I don't find a way to extract this information from a public API. Even if I could, the decision on whether to shrink would be implementation-dependent as the request to shrink is non-binding. Therefore, I choose to use the#if defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)
option you suggested.