Skip to content

Conversation

@bmuddha
Copy link
Collaborator

@bmuddha bmuddha commented Nov 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced transaction processing reliability with intelligent cache management that automatically optimizes and prunes storage capacity when system limits are encountered, then gracefully retries the operation. This significantly reduces processing failures during high-volume transactions or complex computational scenarios, substantially improving overall system stability, throughput, and operational robustness. The system now handles resource-constrained environments more effectively, ensuring consistent transaction processing success rates.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Walkthrough

A retry mechanism is added around replenish_program_cache in load_and_execute_sanitized_transactions. On encountering ProgramCacheHitMaxLimit, the program cache is pruned by deployment slot, a retry flag is set, and the operation is attempted once more. Subsequent failures return the error.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Cache replenishment retry logic
src/transaction_processor.rs
Adds a retry loop around replenish_program_cache that prunes the cache by deployment slot on first ProgramCacheHitMaxLimit error, sets replenish_retried flag to prevent infinite loops, and retries the operation once before returning error on subsequent failures.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Error path validation: Verify that the retry flag correctly prevents infinite loops and that both success and failure paths are properly handled
  • Cache pruning logic: Confirm that pruning by deployment slot is the correct strategy and doesn't inadvertently remove essential cached programs
  • Flag initialization and scope: Ensure the replenish_retried flag is initialized correctly and scoped appropriately to prevent state leakage across transaction batches

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: implementing a retry mechanism for replenishing the program cache when errors occur.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bmuddha/fix/program-cache

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51e1054 and 86c2cb0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/transaction_processor.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/transaction_processor.rs (2)

370-370: LGTM: Retry flag initialization.

The replenish_retried flag clearly tracks whether a retry attempt has occurred, preventing infinite loops.


391-398: Consider whether early return with errors for all transactions is appropriate.

When the program cache hits max limit even after pruning and retry, all transactions in the batch receive ProgramCacheHitMaxLimit errors. This might be overly harsh if only a subset of transactions caused the cache pressure.

However, if the cache cannot be replenished after pruning, continuing execution could lead to incorrect results. Verify this is the intended behavior.

Copy link
Contributor

@GabrielePicco GabrielePicco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@bmuddha bmuddha merged commit 1e6cfeb into main Nov 28, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants