Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
173 changes: 173 additions & 0 deletions proposals/4352-customizable-permalink-base-url.md
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implementation requirements:

  • Client

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
# MSC4352: Customizable HTTPS permalink base URLs via server discovery

## Problem

Matrix currently supports two major ways to reference resources: the `matrix:` URI scheme and HTTPS-based permalinks
commonly using `matrix.to`. The specification explicitly documents the `matrix.to` form and even states that such URIs
"must always start with `https://matrix.to/#/`" for the matrix.to navigation format. This tight coupling to a single
domain prevents organizations and deployments from using their own branded resolver domains for invites and permalinks,
despite valid branding, trust and policy needs. It also fragments behavior across clients which already implement ad-hoc
overrides. \[Spec references: Appendices/URIs and matrix.to navigation; `matrix:` scheme\]

Concretely:

- Organizations want to share "Matrix links" on their own domain for branding and trust.
- Some clients (e.g. Element Web via `permalinkPrefix`) and homeservers (e.g. Synapse email via `client_base_url`)
already support custom bases, but in incompatible, non-standardized ways.
- The spec text hardcodes `matrix.to`, creating friction for standard implementations and documentation.

## Proposal

This MSC introduces a **generic "Matrix link resolver"** concept for HTTPS permalinks and standardizes **discovery** of
a resolver base URL via `/.well-known/matrix/client`. The goal is to keep the **path/arguments format identical** to the
matrix.to navigation format, so that any compliant resolver is a **drop-in replacement**.

### 1. Terminology

- **Matrix link resolver**: An HTTPS service that accepts permalinks in the canonical matrix.to format and routes users
to an appropriate client or intent. Example format:
https://<resolver-domain>/#/<identifier>/<optional event>?via=example.org&via=alt.example.org

The path and query semantics are exactly those defined for matrix.to navigation in the Matrix spec (identifier encoding,
`via` parameters, etc.).

- **Permalink base URL**: The base `https://<resolver-domain>` used by a client/homeserver when generating shareable
HTTPS permalinks.

### 2. Discovery (unstable → stable)

Clients SHOULD determine the permalink base URL using the following precedence:

1. **Per-account or per-client explicit setting** (implementation-defined)
2. **Well-known discovery** for the user's homeserver:

- During MSC incubation (unstable): clients MAY read `/.well-known/matrix/client` and use:
``` json
{
"org.matrix.msc4352.permalink_base_url": "https://links.example.com"
}
```
- After acceptance: the key becomes **stable**:
``` json
{
"m.permalink_base_url": "https://links.example.com"
}
```

3. **Default fallback**: `https://matrix.to`

Clients MUST validate that the discovered value is a valid HTTPS origin and MUST NOT auto-upgrade non-HTTPS URLs.

### 3. Generation algorithm (normative)

**Scope:** This algorithm applies **only** to generating HTTPS permalinks for **outside‑Matrix** contexts (e.g. email,
social networks, the web). Clients **MUST NOT** use resolver‑based HTTPS links for in‑app mentions/links/navigation.

1. Determine `permalink_base_url` by the precedence in Section 2 (user override → well‑known → client default).
2. Construct the path using the matrix.to navigation grammar defined by the spec (identifier encoding, optional event
segment, routing parameters like `via`, etc.).
3. Produce `https://<permalink_base_url>/#/<encoded identifier>[/<encoded event>][?<args>]`.

Clients **SHOULD** continue to prefer the `matrix:` URI scheme for deep‑linking whenever appropriate.

#### In‑app usage (normative)

Clients **MUST NOT** use resolver‑based HTTPS permalinks for in‑app links (mentions, room/event links, or any links
displayed to Matrix users). Clients **MUST** prefer the `matrix:` URI scheme (or native navigation) for all in‑app UX.

#### Sending links in Matrix (normative)

When a user types/pastes a resolver‑style HTTPS permalink in a message composer, the client **SHOULD** preserve the
visible text but **MUST** emit, in `formatted_body`, an anchor whose `href` is the equivalent `matrix:` URI, to ensure
cross‑client interoperability. The plain‑text `body` may keep the original text.

#### Receiving (parsing)

Clients **MUST** handle `matrix:` URIs. Clients **MAY** additionally recognise HTTPS permalinks that follow the
matrix.to navigation grammar regardless of hostname, but this is **not required** by this MSC.

#### Non‑goals

This MSC does **not** standardise applying resolver prefixes to in‑app mentions or in‑app permalinks. Clients **MUST
NOT** rewrite mentions or in‑app links to use resolver domains.

### 4. Resolution behavior

This MSC does **not** require clients to perform network requests to the resolver domain. Like `matrix.to`, clients
SHOULD treat HTTPS permalinks primarily as **hints** for in-app navigation: parse the identifier and act locally if
possible (join, open DM, navigate to event). The resolver service is optional infrastructure for environments without a
Matrix-aware client.
Comment on lines +94 to +99
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This part sounds suspicious. Does the MSC suggest that custom permalink prefixes should be used in-app too instead of only outside the app? If so, how would a client on another homeserver detect that it's a matrix.to-equivalent link?

Element web used to have (or still has? not sure, I hope it was fixed) a bug/anti-feature where permalinkPrefix was applied in @mentions and such in messages too. The result was that mentions, room links and other permalinks were broken for everyone on other clients. I'd be strongly opposed to codifying such a broken feature in the spec.

Even if it's not intended to be used in-app, if a "share" button gives out such links, there's a risk users will send them in-app, leading to worse UX for everyone on other servers (because the app wouldn't be able to route the links internally). If the spec wants to standardize allowing custom links, it might also need to mandate some kind of automatic conversion to matrix: URIs when sending such links in-app. For example, when the user sends https://custom.permalink.to/#/#room:example.com, the client could linkify it before sending and produce <a href="matrix:r/room:example.com">https://custom.permalink.to/#/#room:example.com</a>, which would work in all clients

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the detailed feedback — I fully agree with the risks. MSC4352 does not intend to use a custom HTTPS
resolver for in‑app navigation. The goal is only to generate shareable links for outside‑Matrix contexts
(email/social/other messengers/etc.), while matrix: URIs remain the in‑app priority.

To remove ambiguity, here are normative clarifications I propose to add:

  1. In‑app usage (normative):
    Clients MUST NOT use a resolver-based HTTPS permalink for in‑app links (mentions, room/event links,
    or any navigation shown to Matrix users).
    Clients MUST prefer the matrix: URI scheme (or native navigation) for all in‑app UX.
  2. Sending links in Matrix (normative):
    If a user pastes a https:///#/[/][?...] link, the client SHOULD keep the visible text but
    MUST emit a link whose href is the equivalent matrix: URI in formatted_body, so it works in all clients.
    The plain‑text body may keep the original text; clickability is provided by formatted_body.
    No network calls to the resolver are needed, and no domain is imposed on other clients.
  3. Receiving (non‑breaking):
    Clients MUST support matrix: URIs.
    Clients MAY additionally recognise HTTPS permalinks that match the matrix.to navigation grammar regardless of
    hostname, but this is not required by MSC4352.
    This means MSC4352 does not require clients to parse arbitrary domains; matrix: URIs provide the compatibility path.
  4. Editorial tweak to “Generation algorithm”:
    State that the algorithm applies to share/copy for outside‑Matrix contexts, not in‑app navigation.
    Add an explicit preference for matrix: URIs for any in‑app scenarios.

If the MUST/SHOULD/MAY wording looks reasonable, I can update the MSC

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The goal is only to generate shareable links for outside‑Matrix contexts
(email/social/other messengers/etc.), while matrix: URIs remain the in‑app priority.

What are the requirements for a web service? Should it be something like the matrix.to server hosted alongside a homeserver?

Why another URI scheme (which will inevitably suffer from linkrot when homeservers disappear again)? The Matrix URI is both a registered URI scheme with the iana and is a safelisted schema for HTML5, so it can be used outside of Matrix clients already. Wouldn't it preferable to improve client support for the matrix URI scheme to not have the centralization around resolver servers while still having the trust of "this is an official URI scheme my client understands"?


### 5. Server/Homeserver hints (optional)

Homeservers MAY surface the same base via account data or server configuration for convenience, but the normative
discovery mechanism for clients is `/.well-known/matrix/client` as above.

### 6. Backwards compatibility

- Existing permalinks using `https://matrix.to` remain valid.
- Clients without support for this MSC will keep generating `matrix.to` links.
- Element Web’s `permalinkPrefix` and Synapse email’s `client_base_url` can be aligned to this MSC to reduce
fragmentation.

### 7. Security considerations

- **Phishing/brand impersonation**: Custom resolvers could be abused to masquerade as trusted brands. Requiring
discovery via the user’s **homeserver well-known** prevents arbitrary third-party pages from being promoted by merely
embedding a link. Clients MUST NOT trust a resolver domain solely because it appears in a received link; they should
use it **only when generating links** for that user or after explicit user configuration.
- **Mixed content / TLS**: Only HTTPS origins are permitted. Clients MUST reject `http:` bases.
- **Open redirects**: Resolver implementations SHOULD avoid open redirects and SHOULD validate path/query inputs as per
the matrix.to grammar.

### 8. Privacy considerations

- Using a custom resolver may leak that a user belongs to a particular deployment/organization when links are shared
publicly. This is already true for `matrix.to`. Organizations MUST communicate this to users if privacy is a concern.

### 9. Alternatives considered

- **Use `matrix:` URIs exclusively**: Not sufficient for email/web contexts and platforms which strip custom URI
schemes.
- **Client-only settings (status quo)**: Inconsistent across clients; no standard discovery; harder for orgs to deploy
at scale.
- **Standardize Element’s `permalinkPrefix`**: Too implementation-specific; this MSC proposes a protocol-agnostic field
in well-known instead.
- **Change the path grammar**: Would break compatibility. This MSC preserves the matrix.to grammar for drop-in
replacement.

### 10. Unstable prefixes / feature flag

Until acceptance:

- Well-known key: `org.matrix.msc4352.permalink_base_url`

After acceptance:

- Well-known key: `m.permalink_base_url`

No new endpoints or event types are introduced; therefore no unstable REST namespace is required.

### 11. Dependencies

None.

### 12. Potential issues

- Some mobile clients might deep-link only selected resolver domains. This MSC recommends clients parse and act on
permalinks locally to avoid resolver coupling.
- Organizations need guidance for hosting resolvers; this is intentionally out-of-scope (deployment doc), but we note
parity with matrix.to behavior.

### 13. Implementation notes (non-normative)

- Element Web/Desktop can map existing `permalinkPrefix` to this MSC with minimal changes.
- Synapse can keep using `client_base_url` for email templates; admins should align it with `m.permalink_base_url` to
avoid mismatches.

## References

- Matrix Spec process & proposal guidelines (how MSC numbers and filenames work).
- Spec: `matrix:` URI scheme (introduced in v1.1).
- Spec: matrix.to navigation grammar (Appendices/URIs).
- Existing ecosystem knobs: Element Web `permalinkPrefix`, Synapse email `client_base_url`.