Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cloud-native-for-java-working-group-proposal.adoc #71

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aeiras
Copy link

@aeiras aeiras commented Dec 11, 2019

No description provided.

@aeiras
Copy link
Author

aeiras commented Dec 11, 2019

@kwsutter can you assign this to someone at EF?

even add them as reviewers and watchers of whatever activity is a +1. Thanks!

@kwsutter
Copy link
Member

@kwsutter can you assign this to someone at EF?

even add them as reviewers and watchers of whatever activity is a +1. Thanks!

Hi Amelia,
I will let the EF know about this suggestion, but I don't see them agreeing to it. Granted this proposal does originate from the EF, but there are some organizations and/or individuals in the MP space that may agree with the direction of a single WG. To say that it is not "endorsed" by MP is an overstatement. In the same light, I know there are aspects of the separate WG proposal that are acceptable by some people at the EF. So, I would rather not get into a game of "MP proposal vs EF proposal". That's counterproductive. But, I will let them know about this issue and let them decide. Thanks!

@waynebeaton
Copy link

The requested addition is factually incorrect. The Eclipse Foundation drafted this proposal in collaboration with multiple individuals and organizations within the Eclipse MicroProfile community.

Further, the point of this exercise is to give the MicroProfile community the opportunity to express their opinions. Any statement that the community does not endorse this proposal is premature.

@jclingan
Copy link

jclingan commented Jan 7, 2020

@waynebeaton Can you confirm that CN4J is intended to be more broad than just MicroProfile and Jakarta EE? I had a conference booth conversation with Mike and he mentioned that CN4J could incorporate additional cloud native java projects in the future.

@waynebeaton
Copy link

@waynebeaton Can you confirm that CN4J is intended to be more broad than just MicroProfile and Jakarta EE? I had a conference booth conversation with Mike and he mentioned that CN4J could incorporate additional cloud native java projects in the future.

Confirmed. Subject to approval by the steering committee, of course.

@jclingan
Copy link

jclingan commented Jan 7, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants