Update condition for Mariner and Azure Linux installation for artifacts-helper

[ms-nateb]

Add support for installing on Azure Linux 3.0

[Mark Phippard (markphip)]

ms-nateb have you done the install steps manually so that you know that the install itself works? Can you increment the version number so when I merge we can publish a new release?

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates the artifacts-helper install script to recognize Azure Linux 3.0 as a tdnf-based distro (similar to Mariner) so prerequisites can be installed correctly during feature setup.

Changes:

• Extends OS detection to treat azurelinux VERSION_ID=3.0 like Mariner for package installation.
• Minor formatting/line alignment cleanup at end of script.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/artifacts-helper/install.sh:78

• The OS check is very strict (ID==azurelinux and VERSION_ID==3.0). If Azure Linux ships patch/minor versions (e.g. 3.0.x / 3.1) this will fall through to check_packages, which relies on dpkg/apt-get and will fail on tdnf-based distros. Consider keying off ID==azurelinux regardless of version, ID_LIKE containing mariner, or simply detecting tdnf availability to select the package manager.

if [[ "${ID}" == "mariner" || ( "${ID}" == "azurelinux" && "${VERSION_ID}" == "3.0" ) ]]; then
    tdnf install -y wget ca-certificates
    tdnf clean all
else
    check_packages wget ca-certificates
fi

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

This change adds Azure Linux support, but the feature’s stated OS support (see src/artifacts-helper/README.md “OS Support”) currently only mentions Debian/Ubuntu and Mariner. Please update the OS support documentation to include Azure Linux (and any version constraints) so consumers know it’s supported.

[Mark Phippard (markphip)]

Copilot could we just approach this differently and discover the right package manager? We could probe for tdnf and it found use that, otherwise use dpkg?

[Mark Phippard (markphip)]

Copilot could we just approach this differently and discover the right package manager? We could probe for tdnf and it found use that, otherwise use dpkg?

[Mark Phippard (markphip)]

I took care of this with #107