Skip to content

fix: resolve xarray FacetGrid DeprecationWarning in plot_example.py#482

Open
sohampatil01-svg wants to merge 2 commits intomllam:mainfrom
sohampatil01-svg:fix/xarray-facetgrid-axes-deprecation
Open

fix: resolve xarray FacetGrid DeprecationWarning in plot_example.py#482
sohampatil01-svg wants to merge 2 commits intomllam:mainfrom
sohampatil01-svg:fix/xarray-facetgrid-axes-deprecation

Conversation

@sohampatil01-svg
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sohampatil01-svg sohampatil01-svg commented Mar 21, 2026

Describe your changes

Fixes a DeprecationWarning encountered during testing and plotting by replacing the deprecated g.axes attribute with g.axs on the xarray.plot.FacetGrid object in neural_lam/datastore/plot_example.py. This aligns the codebase with newer versions of xarray (>= 2022.11) which match matplotlib's plt.subplots standard.

No new dependencies are required.

Issue Link

closes #485

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📖 Documentation (Addition or improvements to documentation)

Checklist before requesting a review

  • My branch is up-to-date with the target branch - if not update your fork with the changes from the target branch (use pull with --rebase option if possible).
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • For any new/modified functions/classes I have added docstrings that clearly describe its purpose, expected inputs and returned values
  • I have placed in-line comments to clarify the intent of any hard-to-understand passages of my code
  • I have updated the README to cover introduced code changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have given the PR a name that clearly describes the change, written in imperative form (context).
  • I have requested a reviewer and an assignee (assignee is responsible for merging). This applies only if you have write access to the repo, otherwise feel free to tag a maintainer to add a reviewer and assignee.

Checklist for reviewers

Each PR comes with its own improvements and flaws. The reviewer should check the following:

  • the code is readable
  • the code is well tested
  • the code is documented (including return types and parameters)
  • the code is easy to maintain

Author checklist after completed review

  • I have added a line to the CHANGELOG describing this change, in a section
    reflecting type of change (add section where missing):
    • added: when you have added new functionality
    • changed: when default behaviour of the code has been changed
    • fixes: when your contribution fixes a bug
    • maintenance: when your contribution is relates to repo maintenance, e.g. CI/CD or documentation

Checklist for assignee

  • PR is up to date with the base branch
  • the tests pass
  • (if the PR is not just maintenance/bugfix) the PR is assigned to the next milestone. If it is not, propose it for a future milestone.
  • author has added an entry to the changelog (and designated the change as added, changed, fixed or maintenance)
  • Once the PR is ready to be merged, squash commits and merge the PR.

@sadamov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

sadamov commented Mar 21, 2026

@sohampatil01-svg thanks, please create a corresponding issue, first. and also revert to the original PR template

@sohampatil01-svg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@sohampatil01-svg thanks, please create a corresponding issue, first. and also revert to the original PR template

"Hi @sadamov , thank you for the feedback! I have now created a corresponding issue for this bug (#485) and updated the PR description using the project's original template. Please let me know if any further changes are needed."

@kshirajahere
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sohampatil01-svg
You are still missing this part of PR template-->

## Checklist for reviewers

Each PR comes with its own improvements and flaws. The reviewer should check the following:
- [ ] the code is readable
- [ ] the code is well tested
- [ ] the code is documented (including return types and parameters)
- [ ] the code is easy to maintain

## Author checklist after completed review

- [ ] I have added a line to the CHANGELOG describing this change, in a section
  reflecting type of change (add section where missing):
  - *added*: when you have added new functionality
  - *changed*: when default behaviour of the code has been changed
  - *fixes*: when your contribution fixes a bug
  - *maintenance*: when your contribution is relates to repo maintenance, e.g. CI/CD or documentation

## Checklist for assignee

- [ ] PR is up to date with the base branch
- [ ] the tests pass
- [ ] (if the PR is not just maintenance/bugfix) the PR is assigned to the next milestone. If it is not, propose it for a future milestone.
- [ ] author has added an entry to the changelog (and designated the change as *added*, *changed*, *fixed* or *maintenance*)
- Once the PR is ready to be merged, squash commits and merge the PR.

@sohampatil01-svg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sohampatil01-svg commented Mar 21, 2026

"Thank you for the catch, @kshirajahere! I have now updated the PR body to include the missing sections and matched the exact formatting of the template. Please let me know if everything looks correct now."

@sadamov sadamov self-assigned this Mar 23, 2026
@sadamov sadamov self-requested a review March 23, 2026 05:19
@sadamov sadamov added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] DeprecationWarning in plot_example.py: FacetGrid.axes is deprecated

3 participants