Skip to content

feat(NODE-5055): Add databaseName property to command monitoring events #4586

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 18, 2025

Conversation

baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

@baileympearson baileympearson commented Jul 16, 2025

Description

What is changing?

CommandSucceeded and CommandFailed events now have a database name property.

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

CommandSucceededEvent and CommandFailedEvent events now have a databaseName property

CommandSucceededEvent and CommandFailedEvent now include the name of the database against which the command was executed.

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@baileympearson baileympearson marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2025 15:28
@baileympearson baileympearson requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2025 15:28
@dariakp dariakp self-assigned this Jul 17, 2025
@dariakp dariakp added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Jul 17, 2025
@dariakp dariakp merged commit 3faf0c9 into mongodb:main Jul 18, 2025
31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants