Moving to System.Text.Json

[Ellerbach]

Description

Moving to System.Text.Json

Motivation and Context

• Moving to System.Text.Json

How Has This Been Tested?

On a real device with various scenarios

Screenshots

Types of changes

• Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
• Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
• Unit Tests (add new Unit Test(s) or improved existing one(s), has no impact on code or features)
• Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

• My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
• My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
• I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).
• I have added new tests to cover my changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Removed an external library for JSON serialization from dependency configurations across core components. This update streamlines dependency management and minimizes reliance on external packages for JSON processing, helping to maintain a leaner setup.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request removes the Newtonsoft.Json dependency from the dependency lock files in two projects. In both the nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/packages.lock.json and nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/packages.lock.json files, the entries for Newtonsoft.Json have been completely removed. The Library file previously listed it as a direct dependency, while the Tool file had it as a transitive dependency. No other changes to the dependency structure or JSON format were made.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/packages.lock.json nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/packages.lock.json	Removed the Newtonsoft.Json dependency entry. In the Library file, the direct dependency (requested [13.0.3, ), resolved 13.0.3, with a specified content hash) was removed. In the Tool file, the transitive dependency with the same version and content hash was removed.

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat

• We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
• You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
• Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 046df65 and 46713d0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (7)

• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/CloudsmithPackageInfo.cs is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/FileDeployment/FileDeploymentManager.cs is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/FirmwareArchiveManager.cs is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/FirmwarePackage.cs is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/NetworkDeployment/NetworkDeploymentManager.cs is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/Program.cs is excluded by none and included by none

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/packages.lock.json (0 hunks)
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/packages.lock.json (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)

• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/packages.lock.json
• nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/packages.lock.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: nanoFirmwareFlasher (Build_tool)
• GitHub Check: nanoFirmwareFlasher (Check_Build_Options)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.