-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
Add tabbed examples for multiple node IDs #2512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This PR includes documentation updates Updated pages: |
@@ -1464,39 +1464,64 @@ Now use the previously defined ID spaces when connecting the actors to movies. | |||
== Using multiple node IDs | |||
|
|||
A node header can contain multiple `ID` columns. | |||
The relationship data must then use a matching number of `START_ID` / `END_ID` columns as references to the composite value of those ID columns. | |||
|
|||
Starting from 2025.07, the relationship data must then use a matching number of `START_ID` / `END_ID` columns as references to the composite value of those ID columns. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this true? If I read the comments for the https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/31617 correctly, it is still allowed to use a single :START_ID/:END_ID to refer to a composite ID.
But it is not allowed to mix how to refer to composite IDs. Either all references must use a single :START_ID/:END_ID columns, or a matching amount.
I think this should be reflected on this page too.
+ | ||
[.tabbed-example] | ||
===== | ||
[role=include-with-multiple-node-IDs] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like these headings. It was a super quick decision.
In fact, the first tab is on how to use a single :START_ID/:END_ID
column, and the second one is for matching number of those columns.
Suggestions:
The first tab -- Using single ID column for composite IDs
The second tab -- Using multiple ID columns for composite IDs
[role=include-with-multiple-ID-columns label--new-2025.07] | ||
====== | ||
|
||
Starting from 2025.07, you have to use a matching number of `START_ID` / `END_ID` columns when defining the relationship: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Starting from 2025.07, you have to use a matching number of `START_ID` / `END_ID` columns when defining the relationship: | |
Starting from 2025.07, you can use a matching number of `START_ID` / `END_ID` columns when defining the relationship. | |
However, do not mix how to refer to composite IDs. | |
Either all references must use a single `START_ID` / `END_ID` column or a matching number of them. |
No description provided.