Split DBMS privileges page #2738
Open
+3,233
−2,543
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
renetapopova
force-pushed
the
dev-split-dbms-privileges
branch
from
3a8a985 to
47761a3
Compare
renetapopova
force-pushed
the
dev-split-dbms-privileges
branch
from
e77981e to
ac257e1
Compare
renetapopova
added
the
team-cypher-operations
renetapopova
force-pushed
the
dev-split-dbms-privileges
branch
from
ac257e1 to
82aa4ed
Compare
Hunterness
reviewed
Nov 28, 2025
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/database-administration.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/dbms-administration/index.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| :description: How to use Cypher to manage Neo4j DBMS administrative privileges. | ||
| :page-role: enterprise-edition aura-db-business-critical aura-db-dedicated | ||
| //// | ||
| [source, cypher, role=test-setup] |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel like this list could probably be pruned down to only contain the users/roles that are actually used on this page?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This also applies to the other broken out pages
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, we can do that, but maybe in another PR.
.../pages/authentication-authorization/dbms-administration/dbms-user-management-privileges.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| :description: How to use Cypher to manage Neo4j DBMS administrative privileges. | ||
| :page-role: enterprise-edition aura-db-business-critical aura-db-dedicated | ||
| //// | ||
| [source, cypher, role=test-setup] |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we actually need those code-blocks? Do we use them for testing?
I know we run some Cypher tests, but against the docs-cypher.
In the Ops manual, we're testing other things, not Cypher commands. Or am I mistaken?
Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <[email protected]>
renetapopova
force-pushed
the
dev-split-dbms-privileges
branch
from
701c50d to
8274e93
Compare
Collaborator
|
This PR includes documentation updates New pages:
Updated pages: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.