docs: storage controller retro-RFC #11218
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
erikgrinaker
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2025
7953 tests run: 7569 passed, 0 failed, 384 skipped (full report)Code coverage* (full report)
* collected from Rust tests only The comment gets automatically updated with the latest test results
34e5871 at 2025-03-18T19:42:16.794Z :recycle: |
jcsp
force-pushed
the
jcsp/rfc-retro-storcon
branch
from
5ab2704 to
34e5871
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Various aspects of the controller's job are already described in RFCs, but the overall service didn't have an RFC that records design tradeoffs and the top level structure.
Summary of changes