-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
execute v1 with custom signature #270
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces new asynchronous methods Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
openrpc-testgen/src/utils/v7/accounts/account/execution.rs
(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run cargo_clippy - rust stable
- GitHub Check: Build project - rust stable
🔇 Additional comments (3)
openrpc-testgen/src/utils/v7/accounts/account/execution.rs (3)
203-211
: LGTM! Implementation follows existing patterns.The method correctly delegates to the prepared execution while maintaining proper error handling.
841-852
: LGTM! Clean and focused implementation.The method correctly constructs the transaction request with the custom signature while maintaining all other transaction parameters.
802-816
: Verify signature validation requirements.While the implementation is correct, consider whether any validation of the custom signature is required before broadcasting the transaction.
Run this script to check for signature validation patterns in the codebase:
pub async fn send_with_custom_signature( | ||
&self, | ||
signature: Vec<Felt>, | ||
) -> Result<AddInvokeTransactionResult<Felt>, AccountError<A::SignError>> { | ||
self.prepare() | ||
.await? | ||
.send_with_custom_signature(signature) | ||
.await | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add documentation for custom signature methods.
Consider adding documentation comments to explain:
- The purpose of custom signature methods
- Any requirements or validation for custom signatures
- Security implications of using custom signatures
Example documentation:
+ /// Sends the transaction with a custom signature instead of using the account's signing mechanism.
+ ///
+ /// # Arguments
+ /// * `signature` - The custom signature to use for the transaction
+ ///
+ /// # Security Considerations
+ /// Ensure the custom signature is valid and authorized for this transaction.
pub async fn send_with_custom_signature(
Also applies to: 802-816, 841-852
Summary by CodeRabbit