Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove runtime stdlib dependency from pre-built binary targeting Linux #1605

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2024

Conversation

kateinoigakukun
Copy link
Contributor

@kateinoigakukun kateinoigakukun commented Jan 8, 2024

Currently, the pre-built binary targeting Linux links Swift stdlib and core libraries dynamically. Unlike darwin platforms, Swift does not guarantee ABI stability on Linux, so the pre-built binary must be run with exactly the same version of Swift stdlib and core libraries that it was built with on GitHub Actions. And also the shared libraries can be installed in various locations, so users usually need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

However, asking users to do the above works only for power users. Reducing the runtime dependencies makes it usable for more users.

The only downside of static-linkage is the significant binary-size (9.4M -> 57M). But IMHO a larger binary is better than the one hard to run. The most of huge binary size came from unused ICU data and Foundation, so we can expect it will be much smaller after adopting https://github.com/apple/swift-foundation and LTO integration in SwiftPM (upcoming in 5.10)

Currently, the pre-built binary targeting Linux links Swift stdlib and
core libraries dynamically. Unlike darwin platforms, Swift does not
guarantee ABI stability on Linux, so the pre-built binary must be run
with exactly the same version of Swift stdlib and core libraries that
it was built with on GitHub Actions. And also the shared libraries can
be installed in various locations, so users usually need to set
`LD_LIBRARY_PATH`.

However, asking users to do the above works only for power users.
Reducing the runtime dependencies makes it usable for more users.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ad7707b) 95.25% compared to head (c7038c9) 95.22%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1605      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.25%   95.22%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines       20751    20751              
==========================================
- Hits        19766    19761       -5     
- Misses        985      990       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nicklockwood nicklockwood merged commit 52c2135 into nicklockwood:main Jan 8, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
@kateinoigakukun kateinoigakukun deleted the yt/static-stdlib branch January 8, 2024 17:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants